Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

x1Q(x)x \cdot 1_{\mathbb{Q}}(x) has a limit at 00 and at no other point

Example

With 1Q\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{Q}} as in The indicator of Q\mathbb{Q} has a limit at no point of R\mathbb{R}, let

d:RR,d(x):=x1Q(x),d : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, \qquad d(x) := x \cdot \mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{Q}}(x),

so d(x)=xd(x) = x for rational xx and d(x)=0d(x) = 0 for irrational xx. Then the limit of dd at 00 exists, with

limx0d(x)=0,\lim_{x \to 0} d(x) = 0 ,

and at every c0c \ne 0 the function dd has no limit.

The point of the example. The factor 1Q\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{Q}} has a limit nowhere; multiplying it by xx repairs exactly one point, and only that one. The repair at 00 is the squeeze theorem (If fghf \le g \le h near cc and ff and hh have the same limit at cc, then so does gg) applied to xd(x)x-|x| \le d(x) \le |x|; the failure elsewhere is the same two-sequence argument as in The indicator of Q\mathbb{Q} has a limit at no point of R\mathbb{R}, now with image limits cc and 00, which are distinct precisely because c0c \ne 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The canonical copy QR\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathbb{R} of the rationals, the irrationals X=RQX = \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}, the function d(x)=x1Q(x)d(x) = x \cdot \mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{Q}}(x), and a real c0c \ne 0.

[L1]

The values of dd: d(x)=xd(x) = x for xQx \in \mathbb{Q} and d(x)=0d(x) = 0 for xXx \in X; every real lies in exactly one of Q\mathbb{Q} and XX (The indicator of Q\mathbb{Q} has a limit at no point of R\mathbb{R}).

[L2]

The limit condition (The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA): limxcf(x)=P\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = P means that for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that every xx in the domain with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta satisfies f(x)P<ε|f(x) - P| < \varepsilon.

[L3]

Squeeze theorem: if fgkf \le g \le k on ANη(c)A \cap N^{*}_{\eta}(c) for some real η>0\eta > 0 and the limits of ff and of kk at cc exist and are equal to LL, then the limit of gg at cc exists and equals LL (If fghf \le g \le h near cc and ff and hh have the same limit at cc, then so does gg).

[L7]

Absolute value: u0|u| \ge 0; uuu-|u| \le u \le |u|; u=u|u| = u for u0u \ge 0; 0=0|0| = 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value). Order arithmetic: trichotomy and totality; 0<10 < 1, so 2>02 > 0 and ε/2<ε\varepsilon/2 < \varepsilon for ε>0\varepsilon > 0 (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For every xRx \in \mathbb{R}, xd(x)x-|x| \le d(x) \le |x|: if xQx \in \mathbb{Q} then d(x)=xd(x) = x and xxx-|x| \le x \le |x|; if xXx \in X then d(x)=0d(x) = 0 and x0x-|x| \le 0 \le |x|.

L1L7
1.2

Every real is a limit point of R\mathbb{R}; in particular 00 and the given cc are.

L6
1.3

The functions xxx \mapsto -|x| and xxx \mapsto |x| have limit 00 at 00: given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 take δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon; every xx with 0<x0<δ0 < |x - 0| < \delta satisfies x0=x<ε\bigl| |x| - 0 \bigr| = |x| < \varepsilon and x0=x<ε\bigl| -|x| - 0 \bigr| = |x| < \varepsilon.

L2L7
2.1

The three functions satisfy xd(x)x-|x| \le d(x) \le |x| on all of R\mathbb{R}, in particular on RN1(0)\mathbb{R} \cap N^{*}_{1}(0), and the outer two have limit 00 at 00; since 00 is a limit point of R\mathbb{R}, the squeeze theorem [L3] gives that the limit of dd at 00 exists and equals 00.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L3
2.2

Fix the real c0c \ne 0. By [L5] there are a sequence (qk)(q_k) with all terms in Q{c}\mathbb{Q} \setminus \{c\} and a sequence (uk)(u_k) with all terms in X{c}X \setminus \{c\}, both converging to cc.

step 1.2L5choose
3.1

By [L1], d(qk)=qkd(q_k) = q_k for every kk, so the image sequence (d(qk))(d(q_k)) is (qk)(q_k) itself and converges to cc; and d(uk)=0d(u_k) = 0 for every kk, so that image sequence is constant and converges to 00. Since c0c \ne 0, the two limits are distinct, and both sequences have all their terms in R{c}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{c\} and converge to cc; by [L4] the function dd has no limit at cc.

step 2.2L1L4L7L8
4.1

So the limit of dd exists at 00, with value 00, and fails to exist at every other real: dd has a limit at exactly one point.

step 2.1step 3.1

Remarks

  • Why 00 is the exceptional point. The squeeze bound d(x)x|d(x)| \le |x| is useful only where x|x| is small, that is near 00; at any other cc the two bounding functions have limit c0|c| \ne 0 and c-|c|, which are different, so the squeeze theorem says nothing there. That is not an accident of the proof: the two-sequence argument shows the limit genuinely fails at every such cc.

  • The value d(0)=0d(0) = 0 happens to equal the limit, since 00 is rational, so dd satisfies at 00 the equality that FALSE: limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) whenever both sides exist shows is not automatic. It is the only point of R\mathbb{R} at which dd does so.

  • Contrast with ψ(1/x)\psi(1/x). There the oscillation is bounded and the failure is confined to a single point, 00, with the multiplication by xx repairing precisely that point (xψ(1/x)0x\,\psi(1/x) \to 0 as x0x \to 0, by the squeeze theorem). Here the failure is everywhere and the multiplication repairs precisely one point. The two examples are the same mechanism — a bounded factor damped by a vanishing one — applied to opposite kinds of irregularity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 100 results over 31 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources