Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R\mathbb{R}

Definition

Let ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R} and xRx \in \mathbb{R}, with neighbourhoods as in The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R} and closure as in Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of R\mathbb{R}.

  • xx is an adherent point of AA when Nε(x)AN_\varepsilon(x) \cap A \ne \varnothing for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0.
  • xx is a limit point (or accumulation point) of AA when Nε(x)AN^{*}_\varepsilon(x) \cap A \ne \varnothing for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0: every punctured neighbourhood of xx meets AA.
  • xx is an isolated point of AA when xAx \in A and there is a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 with Nε(x)A={x}N_\varepsilon(x) \cap A = \{x\}.
  • The derived set of AA is A  :=  {xR:x is a limit point of A}.A' \;:=\; \{\, x \in \mathbb{R} : x \text{ is a limit point of } A \,\}.
  • AA is dense in R\mathbb{R} when A=R\overline{A} = \mathbb{R}.

A limit point is an adherent point, since Nε(x)Nε(x)N^{*}_\varepsilon(x) \subseteq N_\varepsilon(x); and an element of AA is an adherent point of AA, since xNε(x)Ax \in N_\varepsilon(x) \cap A (The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R}). So the adherent points of AA are exactly the points of AAA \cup A', a statement proved as part of The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points.

Limit point and isolated point are exact opposites inside AA. For xAx \in A: xx is an isolated point of AA exactly when it is not a limit point of AA. Indeed Nε(x)A={x}N_\varepsilon(x) \cap A = \{x\} says precisely that Nε(x)A=N^{*}_\varepsilon(x) \cap A = \varnothing, because xx itself always lies in Nε(x)AN_\varepsilon(x) \cap A when xAx \in A; so the existence of an ε\varepsilon witnessing isolation is the negation of the condition defining a limit point. A point of AA is therefore either isolated in AA or a limit point of AA, and never both.

A limit point need not belong to the set, and a point of the set need not be a limit point. Both possibilities occur, and the two examples that matter later are 00, which is a limit point of {1/k:k1}\{\, 1/k : k \ge 1 \,\} without belonging to it, and 00 again, which belongs to {0}[1,2]\{0\} \cup [1,2] as an isolated point.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

…and 51 more results.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 22 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources