How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of
Definition
Let and , with neighbourhoods as in The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of and closure as in Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of .
- is an adherent point of when for every real .
- is a limit point (or accumulation point) of when for every real : every punctured neighbourhood of meets .
- is an isolated point of when and there is a real with .
- The derived set of is
- is dense in when .
A limit point is an adherent point, since ; and an element of is an adherent point of , since (The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ). So the adherent points of are exactly the points of , a statement proved as part of The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points.
Limit point and isolated point are exact opposites inside . For : is an isolated point of exactly when it is not a limit point of . Indeed says precisely that , because itself always lies in when ; so the existence of an witnessing isolation is the negation of the condition defining a limit point. A point of is therefore either isolated in or a limit point of , and never both.
A limit point need not belong to the set, and a point of the set need not be a limit point. Both possibilities occur, and the two examples that matter later are , which is a limit point of without belonging to it, and again, which belongs to as an isolated point.
Remarks
-
Terminology: limit point here is about a set, never about a sequence. This library reserves subsequential limit for the sequential notion (Subsequential limit of a real sequence, and the subsequential limit set), and the two are genuinely different: the constant sequence has as a subsequential limit, while its set of values has no limit point at all. The distinction is the one Subsequential limit of a real sequence, and the subsequential limit set records under "Terminology", and it is respected throughout this page.
-
Density is defined through the closure, not through intervals. Saying is equivalent to saying that every nonempty open subset of meets , and also to saying that every neighbourhood of every real meets ; the equivalences follow from The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points and are used in that form in Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable.
-
The derived set need not be comparable with the set. It can be strictly larger, as for : every punctured neighbourhood of any real contains a rational, since density supplies one strictly between and (Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable), so the derived set of is all of . It can be strictly smaller, as for , whose derived set is empty; and it can be neither, as for , whose derived set is , a set containing points outside the original and omitting the point of it. A closed set satisfying is called perfect (Perfect subset of : closed with no isolated points).
Depends on
Used by
- A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant Corollary
- A function differentiable at c is continuous at c Corollary
- A function has no limit at c as soon as two sequences in A ∖ {c} tending to c give different limits of the values Corollary
- If f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ is differentiable with integrable f' then ∫ₐᵇ f' = f(b)-f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz Corollary
- If f is continuous on an interval I and |f'| ≤ M at every interior point, then |f(x) - f(y)| ≤ M|x-y| for all x,y ∈ I, so f is Lipschitz with constant M and uniformly continuous on I Corollary
- ℚ is F_σ, meager and not G_δ, while the irrationals are G_δ, residual and not F_σ Corollary
- {0} ∪ [1,2] is closed, has an isolated point, and is not perfect Counterexample
- A function differentiable on [0,1] whose derivative is unbounded, hence not Riemann integrable Counterexample
- f(x) = x on [0,1) with f(1) = 0 is differentiable at every point of (0,1) with f' ≡ 1, yet no c satisfies f(1) - f(0) = f'(c), so continuity on the closed interval cannot be dropped from the mean value theorem Counterexample
- On the domain {0} ∪ [1,2] every real is vacuously a limit at 0 Counterexample
- ℝ is the union of a meager set and a set of measure zero, so smallness of category and smallness of measure are independent notions Counterexample
- The function equal to 0 off the origin and to 1 at the origin has limit 0 ≠ 1 there Counterexample
- The identity on [0,1] attains its maximum at 1 and its minimum at 0 with derivative 1 at both, so Fermat's theorem genuinely needs the extremum to be at an interior point Counterexample
- The indicator of ℚ has a limit at no point of ℝ Counterexample
- The indicator of ℚ is continuous at no point of ℝ Counterexample
- The sign function is Riemann integrable on [-1,1] and has no primitive there Counterexample
- With f(x) = x³ and g(x) = x² on [-1,1] the quotient form f(b)-f(a)/g(b)-g(a) = f'(c)/g'(c) is meaningless because g(b) = g(a), while the product form of Cauchy's theorem still holds Counterexample
- With g ≡ 0 and f equal to 0 off the origin and 1 at it, lim g = 0 and lim_y → 0 f = 0 while f ∘ g ≡ 1 Counterexample
- x ↦ |x| is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at 0: the difference quotient equals 1 on the right and -1 on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ Counterexample
- x ↦ √x on (0,1] is differentiable with unbounded derivative and is not Lipschitz there, so the boundedness hypothesis in the Lipschitz corollary cannot be dropped Counterexample
- ψ(1/x) has no limit at 0: two sequences tending to 0 give values constantly 0 and constantly 1/2 Counterexample
- Continuity of f : A → ℝ at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim_x → c f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point Definition
- Discontinuity of f at a point of its domain, and its classification: removable discontinuity, jump discontinuity and essential discontinuity, equivalently Rudin's discontinuities of the first and of the second kind Definition
- Limits at +∞ and -∞, and infinite limits at a point Definition
- Local (relative) maximum and minimum of f : A → ℝ at a point, the strict forms, and what it means for the point to be interior to A Definition
- Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of ℝ Definition
- Perfect subset of ℝ: closed with no isolated points Definition
- The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral Definition
- The derivative f'(c) = lim_x → c f(x) - f(c)/x - c of f : A → ℝ at a point c ∈ A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set Definition
- The left and right limits of f at c, as limits of the restrictions of f to A ∩ (-∞, c) and A ∩ (c, ∞) Definition
- The ε-δ limit lim_x → c f(x) = L of f : A → ℝ at a limit point c of A Definition
- Vector-valued functions f : A → ℝᵐ, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions Definition
- {1/k : k ≥ 1} ∪ {0} is compact while {1/k : k ≥ 1} is not closed Example
- Every nondegenerate closed interval is perfect, giving a second proof that it is uncountable Example
- Every polynomial has lim_x → c p(x) = p(c), and rational functions do so away from the zeros of the denominator Example
- For a natural n ≥ 1, the derivative of x ↦ x^1/n on (0,∞) is 1/ι(n)x^1/n - 1, obtained from the inverse rule applied to x ↦ xⁿ; in particular (√x)' = 1/(ι(2)√x) Example
- ℚ has closure ℝ, empty interior, and boundary ℝ Example
- The Cantor set contains no interval of positive length yet has no isolated point, so every connected subset of it is a single point Example
- The chain rule applied to x ↦ (x²+1)⁵ and to x ↦ ((3x-1)²+2)³, with the Carathéodory factor written out in closed form in the first case Example
- The mean value theorem gives |√x - √y| ≤ 1/ι(2) |x - y| for x, y ≥ 1, so the square root is Lipschitz with constant 1/2 on [1,∞) Example
…and 51 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 22 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Limit point (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Isolated point (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dense set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 (Def. 2.18) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)