Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Limits at ++\infty and -\infty, and infinite limits at a point

Definition

Throughout, ++\infty and -\infty are abbreviations and not real numbers, exactly as in Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length and Divergence to ++\infty and to -\infty. Every phrase below is a single abbreviation for a displayed condition on reals, and no arithmetic is ever performed with the symbols.

Limits at ++\infty. Let ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R} be not bounded above (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set), let f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} and let LRL \in \mathbb{R}. We write

limx+f(x)=L\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x) = L

when for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real MM such that

f(x)L<εfor every xA with x>M.|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon \qquad \text{for every } x \in A \text{ with } x > M .

Limits at -\infty. Let AA be not bounded below. We write limxf(x)=L\lim_{x \to -\infty} f(x) = L when for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real MM with f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon for every xAx \in A with x<Mx < M.

Why unboundedness is required. It plays exactly the role the limit-point condition plays in The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA. Saying that AA is not bounded above says that no real is an upper bound of AA, that is, that for every real MM there is xAx \in A with x>Mx > M (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)); so the set over which the condition quantifies is never empty and the condition is never vacuous. Without the hypothesis every real LL would satisfy it and the notation would not denote.

Uniqueness, proved here. Suppose AA is not bounded above and limx+f(x)=L\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x) = L and limx+f(x)=L\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x) = L' with LLL \ne L'. Then LL>0|L - L'| > 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value), so ε:=LL/2>0\varepsilon := |L - L'|/2 > 0 (The multiplicative identity is positive, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication). Choose reals M1,M2M_1, M_2 witnessing the two conditions at this ε\varepsilon and let MM be the larger of them, the order being total. Since AA is not bounded above there is xAx \in A with x>Mx > M, hence with x>M1x > M_1 and x>M2x > M_2, and then

LL=(Lf(x))+(f(x)L)f(x)L+f(x)L<2ε=LL|L - L'| = |(L - f(x)) + (f(x) - L')| \le |f(x) - L| + |f(x) - L'| < 2\varepsilon = |L - L'|

(The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities), which trichotomy forbids. So L=LL = L', and the notation limx+f(x)\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x) denotes a single real. The same four lines, with the inequalities on xx reversed, give uniqueness at -\infty.

Infinite limits at a point. Let ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}, let cc be a limit point of AA (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R\mathbb{R}) and let f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}. We write

f(x)+  as  xcf(x) \to +\infty \ \text{ as } \ x \to c

when for every real MM there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that f(x)>Mf(x) > M for every xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta; and f(x)f(x) \to -\infty as xcx \to c when for every real MM there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 with f(x)<Mf(x) < M for every such xx.

This library does not write limxcf(x)=+\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = +\infty. The right-hand side would not be an element of R\mathbb{R}, and writing the equation would silently move the discussion into the extended real line, a structure that is not a field. That is the convention already fixed by Divergence to ++\infty and to -\infty for sequences and by Conventions: sup\sup \emptyset, unbounded sets, and the extended reals for suprema, and it is kept here. In particular none of the rules of Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero may be applied to a function tending to ±\pm\infty.

Combined forms. Let AA be not bounded above and f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}. We write f(x)+f(x) \to +\infty as x+x \to +\infty when for every real NN there is a real MM with f(x)>Nf(x) > N for every xAx \in A with x>Mx > M. The other forms are obtained the same way, by pairing one of the two conditions on xx (unbounded above, unbounded below) with one of the two conditions on f(x)f(x) (above every real, below every real); each is again a single abbreviation for the displayed condition, and none of them is an equation.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources