Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Comparison, absolute-convergence, and limit-comparison tests for noncompact Henstock–Kurzweil integrals

Statement

Let f,g be HK integrable on every compact truncation near the same missing endpoint.

  1. If g≥0, ∣f∣≤g eventually, and the noncompact integral of g converges, then that of f converges.
  2. If the noncompact integral of ∣f∣ converges, then that of f converges.
  3. If f,g>0 eventually and f/g→c with 0<c<∞, their noncompact integrals converge or diverge together. If c=0, convergence for g implies convergence for f; if c=+∞, convergence for f implies convergence for g.

The corresponding assertions hold at finite and infinite missing endpoints on either side. At an infinite missing endpoint, the notation f/g→+∞ in claim 3 means explicitly that for every real M>0, one has f/g>M throughout some sufficiently late tail; this clause does not rely on a finite-limit definition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The locally integrable functions and eventual inequalities in the Statement.

[L1]

If p and q are HK integrable on a compact interval and p≤q there, then ∫p≤∫q (Monotonicity of the Henstock–Kurzweil integral).

[L2]

Noncompact integrability is equivalent to uniformly small tail integrals (The Cauchy criterion for a Henstock–Kurzweil integral at a missing endpoint).

[L3]

If p and q are HK integrable on a compact interval, then every linear combination is HK integrable and its integral is the same linear combination of their integrals (Linearity of the Henstock–Kurzweil integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L3

On every sufficiently late compact tail, −g≤f≤g. By [L3], −g is integrable with integral −∫g, so two applications of [L1] give −∫g≤∫f≤∫g and hence ∣∫f∣≤∫g; the tail criterion [L2] proves claim 1, and taking g=∣f∣ proves claim 2.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

If f/g→c∈(0,∞), it lies between two positive constants near the endpoint, so two applications of step 1.1 give equivalence; for limit 0 or +∞, the corresponding one-sided eventual bound gives exactly the stated implication.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources