How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linearity of the Henstock–Kurzweil integral
Statement
The Henstock–Kurzweil integral is linear. If are integrable on and , then is integrable and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: HK-integrable functions and scalars .
For every , one gauge controls every fine tagged Riemann sum of an HK-integrable function (The Henstock–Kurzweil integral on a compact interval).
Finite sums are additive and commute with scalar multiplication (Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Proof
For , take the pointwise minimum of gauges from [L1] with half the requested error; by [L2], , and the triangle inequality gives the required estimate.
For a scalar multiple, the case of scalar is immediate, and otherwise [L1] with tolerance and [L2] gives ; combining the sum and scaling conclusions proves the formula.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alessandro Fonda, The Kurzweil-Henstock Integral for Undergraduates, Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Bruckner, Judith Bruckner and Brian Thomson, Real Analysis, Sections 1.2 and 1.21 (standard reference, not scraped)