Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Limit comparison for positive improper integrals

Statement

Let f,g≥0 eventually toward a singular end, with g>0 there, and suppose lim⁡f(x)g(x)=L at that end for a finite L>0. Then the improper integrals of f and g either both converge or both diverge. The statement applies to infinite and finite one-sided endpoints.

If L=0, convergence of ∫g still implies convergence of ∫f; if the ratio tends to +∞, convergence of ∫f implies convergence of ∫g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Eventually positive functions with the stated quotient limit.

[L1]

The definitions of a limit at infinity and of a finite one-sided limit give the same eventual epsilon bound at their respective singular ends (Limits at +∞ and −∞, and infinite limits at a point, The left and right limits of f at c, as limits of the restrictions of f to A∩(−∞,c) and A∩(c,∞)).

[L2]

Eventual pointwise comparison transfers convergence, and finite positive scalar multiples preserve it (Comparison tests for improper integrals, Linearity of convergent improper integrals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], tolerance L/2 gives L/2<f/g<3L/2 sufficiently near the singular end. Thus (L/2)g≤f≤(3L/2)g. Applying [L2] in both directions proves the equivalence.

L1L2
2.1

If L=0, eventually f/g≤1, so f≤g. If f/g→+∞, eventually g≤f. The one-way conclusions again follow from [L2].

L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources