How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Heine criterion: iff for every sequence in converging to
Statement
Let , let , let be a limit point of (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ) and let . The following are equivalent.
- (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
- For every sequence with and for every , and (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals), the sequence converges to .
The two directions do not cost the same. The implication from 1 to 2 is proved in ZF: the sequence is handed to the proof, and nothing is selected. The implication from 2 to 1, as proved below, invokes the axiom of countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) exactly once, at step 3.2, to select one bad point from each of countably many nonempty sets. What this library does and does not claim about that cost is recorded in The sequence-to- direction of the Heine criterion uses countable choice for , and where this library records that cost; the same asymmetry appears, for the same reason, in A point lies in the closure of iff some sequence in converges to it, so a subset of is closed iff it is sequentially closed.
Because of this, the results on this page that can be proved directly from and — the algebra of limits, order preservation, the squeeze theorem, composition — are proved that way, and not through this criterion. What the criterion is for is the transfer of sequential results to functions, and above all the negative use recorded in A function has no limit at as soon as two sequences in tending to give different limits of the values, which needs only the choice-free direction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , a function , a limit point of and a real . Sequences are functions on , and contains (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, The natural numbers (von Neumann)), so the shrinking radii used below are and never .
The function limit: means that for every real there is a real such that every with satisfies (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
Sequential convergence: means that for every rational there is with for all (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences). Testing instead against every positive REAL defines the same relation: every positive rational is a positive real, and below every positive real lies a positive rational (The rationals embed densely in the reals), which is the passage sanctioned in the remarks of Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences.
Limit point: for every real there is with (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
Reciprocal Archimedean property: for every real there is a natural with (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with , Every complete ordered field is Archimedean); the canonical naturals satisfy and are strictly increasing in (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing); and gives (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
Countable choice: for every family of nonempty sets there is a function with for every (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Absolute value (Basic properties of the absolute value); and trichotomy, so the negation of is , and the negation of "for every there is such that P" is "there is such that for every , not P" (Ordered field).
Proof
Assume condition 1, let be a sequence with and for every and , and let be an arbitrary real.
Assume condition 1 FAILS. Negating the quantifiers of [L1], there is a real such that for every real some has and .
By [L1] fix a real such that every with satisfies ; and by [L2], being a positive real, fix with for every .
For put . Each is nonempty, since makes a positive real and step 1.2 applies to that radius.
For every we have and , so and hence . Since was an arbitrary real, ; condition 1 therefore implies condition 2.
By countable choice applied to the family , fix a function with for every .
That sequence has and for every , and it converges to : given a real , [L4] supplies a natural with , and every has , hence .
Yet does not converge to : every has , while a rational with ([L2]) would require some with for all .
So the failure of condition 1 produces a sequence witnessing the failure of condition 2; contrapositively, condition 2 implies condition 1, and with step 3.1 the two conditions are equivalent.
Remarks
-
Where the choice is spent, and where it is not. Step 3.2 is the only use of The Axiom of Countable Choice () in this proof, and it occurs only in the direction from condition 2 to condition 1. Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1, which prove the other direction, use no choice principle. The sequence-to- direction of the Heine criterion uses countable choice for , and where this library records that cost says what may and may not be concluded from that.
-
The sets genuinely have no canonical element. They are cut out by an inequality involving , about which nothing is assumed, so there is no rule in this library that picks a point of uniformly in . That is exactly the situation The Axiom of Countable Choice () exists for, and it is the same situation as in A point lies in the closure of iff some sequence in converges to it, so a subset of is closed iff it is sequentially closed.
-
Why and not . Sequences here are functions on and contains (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), so the index occurs and would be undefined there. The same convention is used in A point lies in the closure of iff some sequence in converges to it, so a subset of is closed iff it is sequentially closed.
Depends on
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Ordered field
Used by
- A function has no limit at c as soon as two sequences in A ∖ {c} tending to c give different limits of the values Corollary
- sin(1/x) has no limit as x tends to zero Counterexample
- The extension of x² sin(1/x) by zero is differentiable but its derivative is discontinuous at zero Example
- The sequence-to-ε direction of the Heine criterion uses countable choice for ℝ, and where this library records that cost Remark
- f is continuous at c ∈ A if and only if f(xₖ) → f(c) for every sequence in A converging to c, the converse direction costing countable choice Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 84 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1: Limits of functions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Limit of a function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (Thm 4.2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of countable choice (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)