How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discontinuity of at a point of its domain, and its classification: removable discontinuity, jump discontinuity and essential discontinuity, equivalently Rudin's discontinuities of the first and of the second kind
Definition
Let , let and let . Then is discontinuous at , and is a discontinuity of , when is not continuous at (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). As in The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and write
(Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), and recall that is defined only when is a limit point of , and only when is a limit point of (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ).
At an isolated point there is nothing to classify. If is an isolated point of (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ), so that for some real , then is continuous at : the - condition of Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point is satisfied by , since the only with is itself and . So every discontinuity is a limit point of , and the classification below covers every case that occurs.
Two-sided points
Suppose is a limit point of both and , so that both one-sided limits are well posed. Say that is a discontinuity
- of the first kind when both one-sided limits exist;
- of the second kind, also called essential, when at least one of the two one-sided limits fails to exist.
A discontinuity of the first kind is further
- removable when ; the common value is then different from , for otherwise If is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree would give and would be continuous at (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point);
- a jump when ; the difference is then called the jump of at .
The three cases removable, jump, essential are mutually exclusive and exhaust the two-sided discontinuities of : either both one-sided limits exist, and then they are equal or not, or one of them does not exist.
Removable is a name for what can be repaired. If is a removable discontinuity with common one-sided value , then the function agreeing with off and taking the value at is continuous at , again by If is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree and Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point: changing the single value removes the discontinuity. No such repair is available at a jump or at an essential discontinuity, since there the two-sided limit does not exist at all and no choice of value at can create it.
One-sided points
If is a limit point of exactly one of and , only that side is defined and only that side is used: is a discontinuity of the first kind when the one-sided limit on the side in question exists, and of the second kind otherwise. When it exists it is different from , since on such a point the one-sided condition and the continuity condition are the same condition; and there is no jump case, there being nothing to compare the value with. The endpoints of an interval are the typical instance.
On the two vocabularies. First kind and second kind are Rudin's terms and are recorded because the literature uses them; removable, jump and essential are the names used in the rest of this library. They name the same three cases and no third classification is introduced.
Depends on
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- The left and right limits of $f$ at $c$, as limits of the restrictions of $f$ to $A \cap (-\infty, c)$ and $A \cap (c, \infty)$
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- If $c$ is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree
Used by
- A bounded function on [a,b] whose set of discontinuities is at most countable is Riemann integrable Corollary
- A derivative has neither a removable discontinuity nor a jump discontinuity Corollary
- The indicator of the Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on a nowhere dense set, and is not Riemann integrable, because that set does not have measure zero Counterexample
- The sign function is Riemann integrable on [-1,1] and has no primitive there Counterexample
- ∫₀³ lfloor x rfloor = 3: the floor function is nondecreasing, hence integrable, and the integral is computed from the uniform partitions Example
- A bounded nondecreasing f : ℝ → ℝ whose set of discontinuities is exactly ℚ, obtained from the prescribed-jump construction applied to one fixed enumeration of the rationals Example
- For every F_σ subset E of [0,1] of measure zero there is a bounded Riemann integrable function on [0,1] whose set of discontinuities is exactly E Example
- Froda's countable bound is attained: a bounded nondecreasing function on ℝ discontinuous exactly at the points 1 - 1/(k+1) for k ∈ ℕ, an infinite discontinuity set inside a bounded interval Example
- The indicator of the Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on the Cantor set, which is null, so it is Riemann integrable with integral 0 even though it is discontinuous at uncountably many points Example
- FALSE: for every integrable f on [a,b], the integral function F(x)=∫ₐˣ f satisfies F' = f on [a,b] False statement
- A bounded function on [a,b] that is continuous except at finitely many points is Riemann integrable Theorem
- A monotone function on an interval has no discontinuity of the second kind: at every point both relevant one-sided limits exist, and an interior point c is a discontinuity exactly when lim_x → c⁻ f(x) < lim_x → c⁺ f(x) Theorem
- Converse to Froda: for every at most countable E ⊆ ℝ there is a bounded nondecreasing f : ℝ → ℝ whose set of discontinuities is exactly E, every one of them a jump Theorem
- For f : A → ℝ the set of points of A at which f is discontinuous is the intersection with A of an F_σ subset of ℝ, and the set of points at which f is continuous is the intersection with A of a G_δ subset; for A = ℝ the two sets are F_σ and G_δ outright Theorem
- Froda's theorem: the set of discontinuities of a monotone function on an interval is at most countable, the injection into ℕ being built from one fixed enumeration of the rationals by least index, so no choice principle is used Theorem
- Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability: a bounded f on [a,b] is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 35 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Classification of discontinuities (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)