Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: for every integrable f on [a,b], the integral function F(x)=∫axf satisfies F′=f on [a,b]

Statement

False claim: let a<b be reals and let f:[a,b]→R be Riemann integrable (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf). Then its integral function F(x)=∫axf (The integral function F(x):=∫axf of an integrable f) is differentiable at every point of [a,b] with F′(x)=f(x) there.

The claim fails in two independent ways, and both are exhibited below.

  1. F′ may fail to exist. For the sign function s on [−1,1] (The sign function is Riemann integrable on [−1,1] and has no primitive there) one has F(x)=∣x∣−1, which is not differentiable at 0.
  2. F′ may exist and differ from f. On [0,1] let f(x):=0 for x≠1/2 and f(1/2):=1. Then F is the zero function, so F′(1/2)=0 while f(1/2)=1.

The second witness shows the failure is not exotic: any integrable f that differs from a continuous g at a single point has the same integral function as g, by Changing an integrable function at finitely many points changes neither its integrability nor its integral, and therefore has F′=g≠f at that point. Continuity of f at the point is what the true theorem The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive asks for, and it asks for nothing more. It is not claimed here to be necessary: what the conclusion needs is the equality F′(c)=f(c), and the last Remark below exhibits an f discontinuous at a point where that equality nevertheless holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sign function s on [−1,1] of The sign function is Riemann integrable on [−1,1] and has no primitive there, with s(x)=−1 for x<0, s(0)=0 and s(x)=1 for x>0; and the function f on [0,1] with f(1/2)=1 and f(x)=0 otherwise.

[A1]

The false claim: for every integrable u on [p,q], the integral function of u is differentiable everywhere on [p,q] with derivative u.

[L5]

Absolute value: ∣x∣=x for x≥0, ∣x∣=−x for x≤0, and ∣x∣/x is 1 for x>0 and −1 for x<0 (Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

First witness. s is integrable on [−1,1] by [L1], and its integral function is F(x)=∫−1xs.

givenL1
1.2

Second witness. The function f on [0,1] is bounded and agrees with the constant 0 off the single point 1/2, so it is integrable with ∫0xf=∫0x0=0 for every x∈[0,1] by [L2] and [L3]; hence its integral function is the zero function.

givenL2L3
2.1

For x∈[0,1]: by [L3], F(x)=∫−10s+∫0xs, and s agrees with the constant −1 on [−1,0] off the single point 0 and with the constant 1 on [0,x] off the single point 0, so [L2] gives F(x)=−1+x. For x∈[−1,0]: s agrees with the constant −1 on [x,0] off 0, so ∫−1xs=−(x−(−1))=−x−1 by [L2] and [L3]. In both cases F(x)=∣x∣−1 by [L5].

step 1.1L2L3L5
2.2

The zero function is differentiable everywhere with derivative 0, so its derivative at 1/2 is 0, while f(1/2)=1≠0. Here F′ exists at the point and differs from f there, so [A1] fails again, in a different way.

step 1.2givenL2L7
3.1

The difference quotient of F at 0 is x↦(F(x)−F(0))/x=∣x∣/x, which is 1 for x>0 and −1 for x<0 by [L5]; so its one-sided limits at 0 are 1 and −1.

step 2.1L5
4.1

By [L4] the limit of that quotient at 0 does not exist, so F is not differentiable at 0 and [A1] fails at s: the claim is false.

step 3.1A1L4
5.1

Both failures occur exactly at a discontinuity of the integrand: s is discontinuous at 0 and f at 1/2. Off those points [L6] applies and gives F′=f, so the correct statement is The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive, whose hypothesis is continuity of the integrand at the point in question.

step 4.1step 2.2L6∎

Remarks

  • The two witnesses are genuinely different failures. In the first, F has no derivative at the bad point at all; in the second, F is as smooth as could be wished and simply computes a different number. A repair attempting to weaken the conclusion to "F is differentiable wherever it can be" would still be refuted by the second witness.

  • What is always true of F is one dimension weaker. For every integrable f the integral function is Lipschitz, hence uniformly continuous (The integral function of a bounded integrable f is Lipschitz, hence uniformly continuous); differentiability is exactly what continuity of the integrand buys, and nothing more is available.

  • The failure set can be much larger than a point. For Thomae's function t on [0,1] the integral function is identically 0, so F′=0 while t is positive at every rational: the claim above then fails at every point of an infinite set, not merely at finitely many. No general statement is made here about an arbitrary integrable f — at a discontinuity where f happens to take the value F′ does, the two agree, and f vanishing off {1/ι(n+1)} is such a case at the point 0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources