Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The integral function F(x):=axfF(x) := \int_a^x f of an integrable ff

Definition

Let a<ba < b be reals and let f:[a,b]Rf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} be integrable (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded ff on [a,b][a,b] as supPL(f,P)\sup_P L(f,P) and infPU(f,P)\inf_P U(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation abf\int_a^b f). The integral function of ff with base point aa is

F:[a,b]R,F(x)  :=  axf.F : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}, \qquad F(x) \;:=\; \int_a^x f .

It is a genuine function, and that has to be checked. For x(a,b]x \in (a,b] the restriction of ff to [a,x][a,x] is integrable, by A function integrable on [a,b][a,b] is integrable on every closed subinterval applied with c:=ac := a and d:=xd := x, so axf\int_a^x f names a single real number (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded ff on [a,b][a,b] as supPL(f,P)\sup_P L(f,P) and infPU(f,P)\inf_P U(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation abf\int_a^b f). For x=ax = a the symbol aaf\int_a^a f is 00 by The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f. So F(x)F(x) is defined at every point of [a,b][a,b] and

F(a)  =  0.F(a) \;=\; 0 .

More generally, for any base point c[a,b]c \in [a,b] the function xcxfx \mapsto \int_c^x f is defined on the whole of [a,b][a,b], the integral being the oriented one of The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f when x<cx < c; the case c=ac = a is written FF above and is the one used unless another base point is named.

The two identities used throughout

Increments are integrals. For all x,y[a,b]x, y \in [a,b], in either order,

F(y)F(x)  =  xyf.F(y) - F(x) \;=\; \int_x^y f .

This is claim 3 of For a<c<ba<c<b: ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c][a,c] and on [c,b][c,b], and then abf=acf+cbf\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,ca,b,c applied to the three points aa, xx, yy: it gives axf+xyf=ayf\int_a^x f + \int_x^y f = \int_a^y f, that is F(x)+xyf=F(y)F(x) + \int_x^y f = F(y). No ordering of xx and yy is assumed, and the degenerate cases x=yx = y, x=ax = a and y=ay = a are included, since claim 3 is stated for arbitrary points.

Changing the base point changes FF by a constant. If c[a,b]c \in [a,b] and Fc(x):=cxfF_c(x) := \int_c^x f, then for every x[a,b]x \in [a,b]

Fc(x)  =  F(x)F(c),F_c(x) \;=\; F(x) - F(c) ,

again by claim 3 of For a<c<ba<c<b: ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c][a,c] and on [c,b][c,b], and then abf=acf+cbf\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,ca,b,c at the points aa, cc, xx. So the family of integral functions of ff is one function up to an additive constant.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 45 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources