How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
as , by the squeeze theorem
Example
Let and define by
with as in The trigonometry-free oscillator is well defined and attained at a nearest integer, takes values in , vanishes exactly on , equals at half-integers, and is -periodic. Then is a limit point of , the limit of at exists, and
The point of the example. The factor has no limit at at all ( has no limit at : two sequences tending to give values constantly and constantly ), so Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero cannot be applied to the product: its product rule requires both factors to have limits. What is available is that stays inside , and a bounded factor multiplied by one tending to is killed. That is exactly what If near and and have the same limit at , then so does delivers, and it delivers the existence of the limit, not merely its value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The set and the function , , with the function of The trigonometry-free oscillator is well defined and attained at a nearest integer, takes values in , vanishes exactly on , equals at half-integers, and is -periodic.
The limit condition (The - limit of at a limit point of ): means that for every real there is a real such that every in the domain with satisfies .
Squeeze theorem: if on for some real , and the limits of and of at exist and are equal to , then the limit of at exists and equals (If near and and have the same limit at , then so does ).
Absolute value: ; exactly when ; ; ; for ; and (Basic properties of the absolute value).
Order and field arithmetic: has an inverse (Field); , so and with for (The multiplicative identity is positive, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication); multiplying an inequality by a non-negative factor, and adding inequalities (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities); the order is total (Ordered field). Those two sources state their moves in their STRICT forms only; the non-strict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide (Ordered field).
Limit point and neighbourhoods (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
Verification
is a limit point of : given a real , the real satisfies , so it lies in , and .
is defined on all of , and there: for we have , so exists, and by [L4], while by [L1] and , so multiplying the inequality by the non-negative factor gives .
The two functions and on each have limit at : given a real , take ; every with satisfies , and likewise .
Hence for every , by [L4] applied to .
The three functions satisfy on all of , in particular on , and the two outer ones have limit at ; since is a limit point of , the squeeze theorem [L3] gives that the limit of at exists and equals .
Remarks
-
Where the hypotheses of the squeeze theorem are met. The order hypothesis holds on all of , so any serves and is taken; the two outer limits are computed by hand in step 1.3; and is a limit point of by step 1.1, which is what makes every limit here well posed (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
-
Nothing about beyond its range is used. Replacing by any function with values in a fixed bounded set would give the same conclusion by the same three steps. What makes the example worth stating is the contrast with has no limit at : two sequences tending to give values constantly and constantly : the same oscillating factor, multiplied by or not, is the difference between a limit existing and not.
-
The classical version of this example is as ; see The classical form of the oscillator above is , which this library can only construct much later for why this library writes and not .
Depends on
- The trigonometry-free oscillator $\psi(x) = \inf_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} |x - n|$ is well defined and attained at a nearest integer, takes values in $[0, 1/2]$, vanishes exactly on $\mathbb{Z}$, equals $1/2$ at half-integers, and is $1$-periodic
- If $f \le g \le h$ near $c$ and $f$ and $h$ have the same limit at $c$, then so does $g$
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- The multiplicative identity is positive
- Field
- Ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 74 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Squeeze theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Limit of a function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)