Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

xψ(1/x)0x\,\psi(1/x) \to 0 as x0x \to 0, by the squeeze theorem

Example

Let A:=R{0}A := \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} and define h:ARh : A \to \mathbb{R} by

h(x)  :=  xψ(1/x),h(x) \;:=\; x \cdot \psi(1/x),

with ψ\psi as in The trigonometry-free oscillator ψ(x)=infnZxn\psi(x) = \inf_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} |x - n| is well defined and attained at a nearest integer, takes values in [0,1/2][0, 1/2], vanishes exactly on Z\mathbb{Z}, equals 1/21/2 at half-integers, and is 11-periodic. Then 00 is a limit point of AA, the limit of hh at 00 exists, and

limx0h(x)  =  0.\lim_{x \to 0} h(x) \;=\; 0 .

The point of the example. The factor ψ(1/x)\psi(1/x) has no limit at 00 at all (ψ(1/x)\psi(1/x) has no limit at 00: two sequences tending to 00 give values constantly 00 and constantly 1/21/2), so Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero cannot be applied to the product: its product rule requires both factors to have limits. What is available is that ψ(1/x)\psi(1/x) stays inside [0,1/2][0,1/2], and a bounded factor multiplied by one tending to 00 is killed. That is exactly what If fghf \le g \le h near cc and ff and hh have the same limit at cc, then so does gg delivers, and it delivers the existence of the limit, not merely its value.

Facts & Assumptions

[L2]

The limit condition (The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA): limxcf(x)=P\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = P means that for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that every xx in the domain with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta satisfies f(x)P<ε|f(x) - P| < \varepsilon.

[L3]

Squeeze theorem: if fgkf \le g \le k on ANη(c)A \cap N^{*}_{\eta}(c) for some real η>0\eta > 0, and the limits of ff and of kk at cc exist and are equal to LL, then the limit of gg at cc exists and equals LL (If fghf \le g \le h near cc and ff and hh have the same limit at cc, then so does gg).

[L4]

Absolute value: u0|u| \ge 0; u=0|u| = 0 exactly when u=0u = 0; uv=uv|uv| = |u|\,|v|; u=u|-u| = |u|; u=u|u| = u for u0u \ge 0; and uuu-|u| \le u \le |u| (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L5]

Order and field arithmetic: x0x \ne 0 has an inverse 1/x1/x (Field); 0<10 < 1, so 2>02 > 0 and 1/2>01/2 > 0 with t/2<tt/2 < t for t>0t > 0 (The multiplicative identity is positive, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication); multiplying an inequality by a non-negative factor, and adding inequalities (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities); the order is total (Ordered field). Those two sources state their moves in their STRICT forms only; the non-strict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide (Ordered field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

00 is a limit point of A=R{0}A = \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}: given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the real ε/2\varepsilon/2 satisfies ε/2>0\varepsilon/2 > 0, so it lies in AA, and 0<ε/20=ε/2<ε0 < |\varepsilon/2 - 0| = \varepsilon/2 < \varepsilon.

L4L5L6
1.2

hh is defined on all of AA, and h(x)x/2|h(x)| \le |x|/2 there: for xAx \in A we have x0x \ne 0, so 1/x1/x exists, and h(x)=xψ(1/x)|h(x)| = |x| \cdot \psi(1/x) by [L4], while 0ψ(1/x)1/20 \le \psi(1/x) \le 1/2 by [L1] and x0|x| \ge 0, so multiplying the inequality ψ(1/x)1/2\psi(1/x) \le 1/2 by the non-negative factor x|x| gives h(x)x/2|h(x)| \le |x|/2.

L1L4L5
1.3

The two functions xx/2x \mapsto -|x|/2 and xx/2x \mapsto |x|/2 on AA each have limit 00 at 00: given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0, take δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon; every xAx \in A with 0<x0<δ0 < |x - 0| < \delta satisfies x/20=x/2<ε/2<ε\bigl| |x|/2 - 0 \bigr| = |x|/2 < \varepsilon/2 < \varepsilon, and likewise x/20=x/2<ε\bigl| -|x|/2 - 0 \bigr| = |x|/2 < \varepsilon.

L2L4L5
2.1

Hence x/2h(x)x/2-|x|/2 \le h(x) \le |x|/2 for every xAx \in A, by [L4] applied to h(x)x/2|h(x)| \le |x|/2.

step 1.2L4
3.1

The three functions satisfy x/2h(x)x/2-|x|/2 \le h(x) \le |x|/2 on all of AA, in particular on AN1(0)A \cap N^{*}_{1}(0), and the two outer ones have limit 00 at 00; since 00 is a limit point of AA, the squeeze theorem [L3] gives that the limit of hh at 00 exists and equals 00.

step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1L3

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 74 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources