How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sign function has both one-sided limits at and no two-sided limit
Example
Define by
Then is a limit point of both and , both one-sided limits at exist (The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and ),
and has no limit at .
This is the standard illustration of If is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree: the two one-sided limits both exist, so nothing is missing on either side, yet they disagree, and disagreement is exactly what the theorem converts into the failure of the two-sided limit. Note also that the value is equal to neither one-sided limit, and is irrelevant to all three assertions (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function above, with , , and (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
The limit condition (The - limit of at a limit point of ): means that for every real there is a real such that every in the domain with satisfies .
One-sided limits are the limits at of the restrictions of to and , and are well posed exactly when is a limit point of the set in question (The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and ).
Limit point and neighbourhoods (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
Absolute value: ; ; for and for (Basic properties of the absolute value).
Order in : trichotomy, so every real satisfies exactly one of , , ; and hence , and for ; and , so and in particular (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Ordered field).
Two-sided versus one-sided: if is a limit point of both and and , then and (If is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree).
At a limit point of its domain a function has at most one limit (At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit); applied to the restrictions, each one-sided limit is a single real.
Verification
is a well-defined function on : by trichotomy every real satisfies exactly one of the three defining conditions.
is a limit point of and of : given a real , the real is positive, hence lies in , and satisfies ; and is negative, hence lies in , and satisfies .
The reals and are distinct, since .
: by [L2] this is the limit at of the restriction of to , which is well posed by step 1.2. Given a real , any serves, since every has , hence and .
: identically, every has , hence and for every and every .
Suppose had a limit at , say . Since is a limit point of both and by step 1.2, [L6] gives and ; each one-sided limit is single valued by [L7], so steps 2.1 and 2.2 force and , contradicting step 1.3. Hence has no limit at .
Remarks
-
The failure is not about the value at . Redefining to be , or , or anything else changes nothing: The - limit of at a limit point of never evaluates the function at the point, and the two one-sided limits are computed on sets that exclude (The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and ). This is a genuine jump, not a removable defect of the kind FALSE: whenever both sides exist exhibits.
-
Away from the function is locally constant, so it has a limit at every other point of , equal to its value there: for take to be itself, and every with has and ; symmetrically for . So the single point carries the whole phenomenon.
-
Contrast with the two other failures on this page. Here both one-sided limits exist and differ; for at ( has no limit at : two sequences tending to give values constantly and constantly ) the failure is already one-sided, both witnessing sequences there having positive terms; and for the indicator of (The indicator of has a limit at no point of ) the failure occurs at every point at once.
Depends on
- The left and right limits of $f$ at $c$, as limits of the restrictions of $f$ to $A \cap (-\infty, c)$ and $A \cap (c, \infty)$
- If $c$ is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- The multiplicative identity is positive
- Ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sign function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- One-sided limit (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)