Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

1/4 lies in the Cantor set and is the endpoint of no removed interval, so the endpoints do not exhaust it

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the Cantor set C consists of the endpoints of the removed intervals and is therefore at most countable (FALSE: the Cantor set is countable because only countably many intervals were removed).

The witness is x0:=1/4. It lies in C, its ternary digit sequence being the alternating sequence (0,2,0,2,… ) (Which points of [0,1] lie in the Cantor set, read off their ternary expansions, with 1/4 worked out), and it is the endpoint of no interval removed in the construction. Here, as everywhere on this page, u is an endpoint of a removed interval means that u∈C and there is v≠u with the open interval between u and v disjoint from C; that is exactly what "the interval between them was removed" says in the vocabulary available. What is shown below is that C meets every interval (x0,x0+δ) and every interval (x0−δ,x0), for every real δ>0, so no such v exists on either side.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Cantor set C, the set D of {0,2}-valued sequences and the bijection Φ:D→C of The Cantor set is exactly the set of ∑k≥1ak3−k with every ak∈{0,2}, and this gives a bijection with {0,1}N; the alternating sequence a∈D, with aj=0 for even j and aj=2 for odd j; and x0:=Φ(a).

[A1]

The refuted claim: every point of C is an endpoint of a removed interval, so C is at most countable.

[L2]

Geometric tails: ∑j≥m2⋅3−j−1=3−m; a series of nonnegative terms has nonnegative sum and all partial sums at most the sum; convergent series add and scale termwise; and a series splits as ∑j≥0tj=∑j<mtj+∑j≥mtj (For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges, A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum, Convergent series add and scale termwise, Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, Integer powers am, Laws of integer exponents).

[L4]

Ordered-field arithmetic: 0<1, so 3>0 and 3−1>0 and 2⋅3−1<1; 3−p≤3−q whenever q≤p, by induction from 0<3−1<1; adding a constant and multiplying by a positive preserve an inequality (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). These order-arithmetic facts are stated by their sources for the strict order only; the nonstrict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] the point x0=1/4 lies in C and has digit sequence a, with a2m=0 and a2m+1=2 for every m∈N. By [L2], for every m one may split Φ(a)=∑j<2maj3−j−1+∑j≥2maj3−j−1, and every tail ∑j≥paj3−j−1 lies between 0 and 3−p.

givenL1L2
2.1

Points of C immediately above x0. For m∈N let b∈D agree with a at every index <2m, have b2m=2, and have bj=0 for j>2m. Writing P:=∑j<2maj3−j−1, step 1.1 and [L2] give Φ(b)=P+2⋅3−2m−1 and Φ(a)=P+0+T with 0≤T≤3−2m−1, so Φ(b)−x0=2⋅3−2m−1−T lies between 3−2m−1 and 2⋅3−2m−1; in particular Φ(b)>x0 and Φ(b)−x0≤2⋅3−2m−1<3−2m≤3−m by [L4]. And Φ(b)∈C by [L1].

step 1.1L1L2L4
2.2

Points of C immediately below x0. For m∈N let d∈D agree with a at every index <2m+1, have d2m+1=0, and have dj=2 for j>2m+1. Writing Q:=∑j<2m+1aj3−j−1, step 1.1 and [L2] give Φ(d)=Q+0+3−2m−2 and Φ(a)=Q+2⋅3−2m−2+T′ with 0≤T′≤3−2m−2, so x0−Φ(d)=3−2m−2+T′ lies between 3−2m−2 and 2⋅3−2m−2; in particular Φ(d)<x0 and x0−Φ(d)<3−2m−1≤3−m by [L4]. And Φ(d)∈C by [L1].

step 1.1L1L2L4
3.1

Let the real δ>0 be given; by [L3] fix m with 3−m<δ. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 then produce points of C in (x0, x0+δ) and in (x0−δ, x0). Consequently, for every v>x0 the interval (x0,v) meets C, and for every u<x0 the interval (u,x0) meets C; so there is no v≠x0 with the open interval between x0 and v disjoint from C, and x0 is the endpoint of no removed interval. Since x0∈C, the claim [A1] fails at x0.

step 2.1step 2.2A1L1L3L4∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources