Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For r<1|r| < 1, k0rk=1/(1r)\sum_{k \ge 0} r^k = 1/(1-r), and for r1|r| \ge 1 the series diverges

Statement

Let rRr \in \mathbb{R} and let rkr^k be the integer power (Integer powers ama^m), so that r0=1r^0 = 1 for every rr, including r=0r = 0.

  1. If r<1|r| < 1 then the series rk\sum r^k converges (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series) and k=0rk  =  11r.\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} r^{k} \;=\; \frac{1}{1-r} .
  2. If r1|r| \ge 1 then rk\sum r^k diverges.

The series starts at k=0k = 0 and its first term is r0=1r^0 = 1; in particular k=02k=2\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 2^{-k} = 2, while the series starting at k=1k = 1 sums to 11. Which starting index is meant has to be said, and it is said here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real number rr, the integer powers rkr^k (Integer powers ama^m), and the partial sums sn=k<nrks_n = \sum_{k<n} r^k of rk\sum r^k (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion).

[L1]

Factorisation of a difference of powers: for a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} and natural n1n \ge 1, bnan=(ba)k=0n1akbn1kb^n - a^n = (b-a)\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} a^k b^{\,n-1-k} (Factorisation of bnanb^n - a^n, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate).

[L3]

Algebra of limits: sums, differences and quotients of convergent sequences converge to the corresponding combination, the quotient rule requiring a nonzero limit and nonzero denominators (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

[L4]

Absolute value: xy=xy|xy| = |x|\,|y|, x0|x| \ge 0, and x=0|x| = 0 exactly when x=0x = 0; also 1=1|1| = 1, since 1>01 > 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L5]

Powers and order: a0=1a^0 = 1 for every aa; if a1a \ge 1 and n1n \ge 1 then ana1a^n \ge a \ge 1; and 1n=11^n = 1 for every nn (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n, Integer powers ama^m).

[L6]

The principle of induction (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L7]

If a series converges then its terms tend to 00 (If a series converges then its terms tend to 00).

[L8]

Notation of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion: k=0n1xk\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} x_k is k<nxk\sum_{k<n} x_k, and the empty sum k<0xk\sum_{k<0} x_k is 00.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Assume r<1|r| < 1.

assume-case lt
1.2

Assume instead r1|r| \ge 1.

assume-case ge
1.3

For every natural n1n \ge 1, applying [L1] with b=1b = 1 and a=ra = r gives 1rn=(1r)k=0n1rk1n1k=(1r)sn1 - r^n = (1-r)\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} r^k \cdot 1^{\,n-1-k} = (1-r)\,s_n, using 1m=11^m = 1 and the notation of [L8].

L1L5L8
1.4

At n=0n = 0 the identity 1rn=(1r)sn1 - r^n = (1-r)s_n also holds, both sides being 00 because r0=1r^0 = 1 and s0s_0 is the empty sum.

L5L8
2.1

In the case r<1|r| < 1 we have r1r \ne 1, since 1=1|1| = 1 and r<1|r| < 1; hence 1r01 - r \ne 0.

step 1.1L4algebra
2.2

In the case r1|r| \ge 1, an induction gives rk=rk|r^k| = |r|^k for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}: at k=0k = 0 both sides are 11, and if rk=rk|r^k| = |r|^k then rk+1=rkr=rkr=rkr=rk+1|r^{k+1}| = |r^k \cdot r| = |r^k|\,|r| = |r|^k |r| = |r|^{k+1}.

step 1.2L4L5L6
2.3

In the case r1|r| \ge 1 we get rk1|r|^k \ge 1 for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}: at k=0k = 0 this reads 111 \ge 1, and for k1k \ge 1 it is the comparison rkr1|r|^k \ge |r| \ge 1.

step 1.2L5
3.1

In the case r<1|r| < 1, dividing by 1r01 - r \ne 0 gives sn=(1rn)/(1r)s_n = (1 - r^n)/(1-r) for every nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

step 2.1step 1.3step 1.4algebra
3.2

In the case r1|r| \ge 1, combining the two previous steps gives rk0=rk=rk1|r^k - 0| = |r^k| = |r|^k \ge 1 for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}.

step 2.2step 2.3
4.1

In the case r<1|r| < 1 the sequence (rn)(r^n) is null, so 1rn11 - r^n \to 1 and therefore sn1/(1r)s_n \to 1/(1-r), the denominator being the nonzero constant 1r1-r; hence rk\sum r^k converges with sum 1/(1r)1/(1-r), which is claim 1.

step 1.1step 3.1step 2.1L2L3
4.2

In the case r1|r| \ge 1 the sequence (rk)(r^k) does not converge to 00, since the rational tolerance ε=1\varepsilon = 1 admits no index KK with rk0<1|r^k - 0| < 1 for all kKk \ge K; so by the term test rk\sum r^k diverges, which is claim 2.

step 3.2L7
5.1

The two cases r<1|r| < 1 and r1|r| \ge 1 exhaust the possibilities, since the order on R\mathbb{R} is total, so claims 1 and 2 together cover every real rr.

step 4.1step 4.2cases-exhaustive

Remarks

  • The divergence half needs no separate treatment of r=1r = 1 and r=1r = -1. Both are covered by r1|r| \ge 1, and the single reason is the same in every case: the terms have absolute value at least 11, so they cannot tend to 00. For r=1r = 1 the partial sums are sn=ns_n = n and run to ++\infty; for r=1r = -1 they oscillate between 00 and 11. The theorem says only that neither converges, which is all that "diverges" means here (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series).

  • Why the identity is proved at n=0n = 0 separately. Factorisation of bnanb^n - a^n, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate requires n1n \ge 1, since its right-hand side is a sum over k<nk < n of a term involving bn1kb^{\,n-1-k}, and n1n-1 is not a natural number at n=0n = 0. The identity is still true at n=0n = 0, but by inspection of two empty objects rather than by that lemma, and step 1.4 says so rather than letting the reader assume the citation covers it.

Depends on

Used by

…and 16 more results.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 93 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources