Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The power series of z0/(1−z1) and the shape of its domain of convergence

Example

On the region {(z0,z1)∈C2:∣z1∣<1} one has

z01−z1=∑j=0∞z0z1j.

Equivalently, in multi-index notation,

z01−z1=∑α∈N2cαzα,

where c(1,j)=1 for every j∈N and cα=0 otherwise. When z0≠0, the series converges absolutely exactly when ∣z1∣<1; when z0=0, every term vanishes and the series converges absolutely for every z1. Thus its absolute-convergence set is (C×D(0,1))∪({0}×C), an unbounded set and not a bounded polydisc.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function f(z)=z0/(1−z1) on the region ∣z1∣<1.

[L1]

For complex w, the geometric series ∑j≥0wj converges absolutely exactly when ∣w∣<1: if ∣w∣<1, then ∑j≥0∣w∣j converges by For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges, so Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum applies, and the finite identity (1−w)∑j<nwj=1−wn together with ∣wn∣=∣w∣n→0 gives the sum 1/(1−w) (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, For ∣r∣<1 the sequence rk is null, and for ∣r∣>1 the sequence ∣r∣k diverges to +∞, C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)). If ∣w∣≥1, then the same real geometric-series criterion shows that ∑j≥0∣w∣j diverges, so for every nonzero complex constant c the series ∑j≥0c wj cannot be absolutely convergent.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1

If ∣z1∣<1, then [L1] gives (1−z1)−1=∑j≥0z1j, so multiplying by z0 yields z0/(1−z1)=∑j≥0z0z1j.

2.1step 1.1

In multi-index form this is the stated coefficient rule: the only monomials that appear are z0z1j, so c(1,j)=1 and every other coefficient is 0.

2.2step 1.1L1

The absolute-value series is ∑j≥0∣z0∣∣z1∣j. If z0≠0, division by the positive constant ∣z0∣ and [L1] show that it converges exactly when ∣z1∣<1. If z0=0, every term is 0, so it converges for every z1. Hence the absolute-convergence set is (C×D(0,1))∪({0}×C).

3.1step 2.2∎

At points (0,z1) with ∣z1∣≥1, every term of the series is 0, so the series still converges there to 0, although the quotient is undefined when z1=1 and this exceptional convergence set is not open.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources