How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in
Definition
The factorial. By the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) applied to the set , the starting element and the function , and by the same induction on the first coordinate as in Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, and in , there is a unique with
We write . Thus , , , , , , .
is the base clause of this recursion, not a convention imported from elsewhere. Nothing about empty products is presupposed; the agreement with the empty product is proved below, in clause (a), rather than assumed.
Truncated difference. Throughout, is the operation fixed in Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, and in : the unique with when , and when .
The falling factorial. For define by recursion on , by the recursion theorem applied to with starting element and :
So and , and for the value is the product of the topmost factors.
Four facts, proved here because the page uses each of them.
(a) The factorial is the product of the first positive naturals. , the -valued product of Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, and in . Induction (The principle of mathematical induction): at both sides are , the empty product and the base clause agreeing; and . So the empty-product reading and the base-clause reading are the same reading, and neither was assumed.
(b) , and . For the first, (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system) and is a product of two nonzero naturals, which is nonzero: if with then (Zero and one under multiplication) and cancellation gives (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor). So for every by induction. For the second, apply the bridge clause 6 of that lemma to clause (a) above. This is what makes the factorial of this page and the real-valued product used elsewhere in the library one object seen twice, rather than two unrelated notions.
(c) for . Induction on , for all at once. At this reads . Assume it at and let ; then , and writing we have and , since ; so for a unique (Every nonzero natural number is a successor), and , that is (Addition is cancellative). Therefore , using commutativity and associativity of multiplication (Multiplication is associative, Multiplication is commutative) and the recursion clause for the factorial.
(d) Boundary values. for every , by the base clause; , since clause (c) at gives and ; and whenever . For the last, gives , the clause being definitional (Multiplication of natural numbers), and if then as well, so for every by induction.
Remarks
-
Why is not imported. The empty-product convention of an arbitrary monoid is fixed in The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity ↗, which comes later in the reading order, so citing it here would be a dependency pointing the wrong way. Taking as the base clause of the factorial's own recursion costs nothing and owes nothing, and clause (a) then records the agreement.
-
The library's other factorial. For every real , ↗, later in the reading order, works with a real-valued factorial defined as the product in . Clause (b) says that this is exactly , so the two agree and no second notion has been created. That pointer is orientation only.
-
Check every clause at and at . The falling factorial is defined by two regimes, one for and one beyond, and the recursion above covers both because the truncated difference is past the end. The two values that get used constantly are and , and both are clause (d).
Depends on
- The recursion theorem
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, $\sum_{k<n} a_k$ and $\prod_{k<n} a_k$ in $\mathbb{N}$
- Laws of finite sums and products in $\mathbb{N}$, and $\iota\big(\sum_{k<n} a_k\big) = \sum_{k<n} \iota(a_k)$
- Multiplication of natural numbers
- Multiplication is associative
- Multiplication is commutative
- Zero and one under multiplication
- Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor
- Addition is cancellative
- Order on the natural numbers
- Every nonzero natural number is a successor
- The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
Used by
- A power-series sum is infinitely differentiable inside its radius and satisfies aₙ=f⁽ⁿ⁾(c)/ι(n!) at its centre Corollary
- A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound Corollary
- Aₙ is normal in Sₙ; for n≥2, 2 |Aₙ|=n!, while Aₙ=Sₙ for n=0,1 Corollary
- Every subgroup of index p in a finite p-group is normal Corollary
- The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder Corollary
- ι(Dₙ) = ι(n) ι(Dₙ₋₁) + (-1)ⁿ for n ≥ 1, and Dₙ = (n-1)(Dₙ₋₁ + Dₙ₋₂) for n ≥ 2 Corollary
- The series ∑_n≥0ι(n!)xⁿ converges only at x=0 and has radius zero Counterexample
- Two sets of the same finite cardinality between which the bijection is not unique Counterexample
- Cᵏ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space Definition
- Taylor polynomials and their remainders Definition
- The complex exponential by its power series Definition
- The derangement number Dₙ: the number of bijections of an n-element set with no fixed point Definition
- The real exponential function and the number e by a power series Definition
- All 8 functions 3 → 2, the 0 injections 3 → 2, and the 8 subsets of a 3-element set Example
- All nine derangements of a four-element set listed, and the count checked against the formula and both recurrences Example
- Arrangements of a word with repeated letters, counted by the multinomial coefficient Example
- Choosing a committee: binom103 = 120, and the ordered count 10^underline3 = 720 Example
- Five-card hands from a 52-card deck: binom525 = 2598960, and the count of hands with all cards of one suit Example
- For every n ∈ ℕ there are n consecutive composite integers: with N := ∏_j<n(j+2), each of N+2, …, N+n+1 is composite Example
- Pascal's triangle computed to row 6, with Pascal's rule checked at every interior entry Example
- The 15 weak compositions of 4 into 3 parts, listed and matched against stars and bars Example
- The one-sided flat function is C^∞ with identically zero Taylor series Example
- The ratio ι(Dₙ)/ι(n!) computed for small n as a quotient of two counts, with no probability space claimed Example
- The Taylor polynomial of (1-x)⁻¹ at 0 has the exact geometric remainder xⁿ⁺¹/(1-x) Example
- Vandermonde's identity checked at m = 4, n = 3, k = 3, both sides equal to 35 Example
- A geometric bound for tails of the exponential series Lemma
- For fixed k, binomnk/nᵏ tends to 1/k! Lemma
- Taylor polynomials match the prescribed derivatives at the centre Lemma
- The Boolean lattice on an n-element set has n! maximal chains, and exactly k!(n-k)! contain a fixed k-set Lemma
- The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument Lemma
- Conventions fixed on this page, and what counting is deliberately not done here Remark
- Scope, endpoint, factorial, and deferred-remainder conventions Remark
- A finite set A with | A| = n has exactly n! bijections onto itself, and n! bijections onto any set of the same cardinality Theorem
- A finite set with n elements has exactly binomn2 two-element subsets, and 2 binomn2 = n(n-1) Theorem
- binomnk k! (n-k)! = n! for k ≤ n; hence binomnk k! = n^underlinek, the quotient n!/(k!(n-k)!) is a natural number, and binomnk = binomnn-k Theorem
- Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem: for 1≤ k and n≥ 2k, an intersecting family of k-subsets of an n-set has size at most binomn-1k-1, and a star attains the bound Theorem
- Erdős-Rado sunflower lemma: more than k!(r-1)ᵏ distinct k-sets contain an r-petal sunflower Theorem
- If [G:H]=n<∞, then Core_G(H) is normal in G, [G:Core_G(H)]∣ n!, and only finitely many subgroups contain H Theorem
- Picard iteration from 1 produces the exponential partial sums Theorem
- Taylor's Schlömilch–Roche remainder formula Theorem
…and 10 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 52 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Factorial (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Falling and rising factorials (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Empty product (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)