How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder
Statement
Under the hypotheses of Taylor's Schlömilch–Roche remainder formula, there are points between and such that and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses of the Schlömilch-Roche theorem.
For each natural , the Schlömilch-Roche theorem gives a point strictly between and such that (Taylor's Schlömilch–Roche remainder formula).
Factorials and natural powers obey The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in and Integer powers , while the canonical embedding preserves products and positive naturals are nonzero (The canonical natural of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
Proof
Set in [L1]. Then and , giving the Lagrange form.
Set . Since , the formula becomes the Cauchy form.
These are the asserted special cases.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 75 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MIT OpenCourseWare 18.100B Real Analysis, Spring 2025 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- MathWorld, Schlömilch's remainder (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Taylor's theorem and related calculus (standard reference, not scraped)