Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Peano's form: the normalized Taylor remainder tends to zero

Statement

Let n1n\ge1. If there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that ff is nn-times differentiable on the open interval Nδ(a)=(aδ,a+δ)N_\delta(a)=(a-\delta,a+\delta), then Rn,af(x)(xa)n0(xa).\frac{R_{n,a}f(x)}{(x-a)^n}\longrightarrow0\qquad(x\to a). Equivalently, in the usual little-oo shorthand, f(x)=Tn,af(x)+o((xa)n)f(x)=T_{n,a}f(x)+o((x-a)^n). For n=0n=0, the analogous assertion is the separate continuity condition at aa: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, all domain points xx sufficiently near aa satisfy f(x)f(a)<ε|f(x)-f(a)|<\varepsilon.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated differentiability on the open neighbourhood Nδ(a)N_\delta(a) of The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R}, or the separate continuity hypothesis when n=0n=0.

[L2]

The derivative quotient is The derivative f(c)=limxcf(x)f(c)xcf'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c} of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point cAc \in A that is a limit point of AA, and differentiability on a set, differentiability implies continuity (A function differentiable at cc is continuous at cc), and continuity at aa has the stated quantified condition (Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). The Cauchy quotient lemma is Cauchy's mean-value theorem in quotient form when the denominator derivative is nonzero, the shifted-power derivative follows from For a natural n1n \ge 1 the function xxnx \mapsto x^{n} is differentiable everywhere with derivative ι(n)xn1\iota(n)\,x^{\,n-1}; for n=0n = 0 it is the constant 11, with derivative 00; for a natural n1n \ge 1 the function xxnx \mapsto x^{-n} is differentiable at every x0x \ne 0 with derivative ι(n)xn1-\iota(n)\,x^{-n-1}; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term and The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if gg is differentiable at cc and ff is differentiable at g(c)g(c), then fgf \circ g is differentiable at cc with (fg)(c)=f(g(c))g(c)(f \circ g)'(c) = f'(g(c))\,g'(c), and finite limits are The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA and obey Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero.

[L3]

For n1n\ge1, the canonical real ι(n)\iota(n) is positive and hence nonzero (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Under the separate n=0n=0 hypothesis, the quantified assertion is exactly the definition of continuity at aa.

givenL2
1.2

For n=1n=1, the derivative definition gives f(x)f(a)f(a)(xa)xa=f(x)f(a)xaf(a)0.\frac{f(x)-f(a)-f'(a)(x-a)}{x-a} =\frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}-f'(a)\longrightarrow0. This is the required base case.

basegivenL2
1.3

Assume n2n\ge2 and the assertion through order n1n-1. Put R=Rn,afR=R_{n,a}f. Then R(a)=R(a)=0R(a)=R'(a)=0, and R(x)=Rn1,a(f)(x)R'(x)=R_{n-1,a}(f')(x).

L1algebra
2.1

By the induction hypothesis applied to ff', R(x)/(xa)n10R'(x)/(x-a)^{n-1}\to0. Applying the Cauchy quotient lemma to R(x)R(a)R(x)-R(a) and (xa)n(x-a)^n gives R(x)/(xa)n=R(ξ)/(ι(n)(ξa)n1)R(x)/(x-a)^n=R'(\xi)/(\iota(n)(\xi-a)^{n-1}) for a point ξ\xi between aa and xx.

step 1.3ihL2L3
3.1

Since ξa\xi\to a, the right side tends to 00. This proves the Peano estimate without assuming continuity of f(n)f^{(n)}.

step 2.1L2discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 99 results over 25 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources