How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment
Statement
Let , let be open and convex, , and . Write for the canonical-natural map of The multivariable Taylor polynomial in multi-index notation. Then some satisfies
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses of the statement.
Convexity keeps the segment in for (A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points).
On an open interval containing , the derivatives of have the multi-index expansion through order (Repeated derivatives along a line expand by the multinomial formula).
By The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder, if a one-variable function has derivatives through order on with the required endpoint continuity, then some satisfies
by the Lagrange remainder formula.
Proof
Put and . The set is open, contains by [L1], and is an interval because is convex. Hence [L2] shows that has the derivatives through order required by [L3].
Apply [L3] to between and .
Substitute the formula of [L2] for and ; the degree- part is the definition of .
Depends on
Used by
- Constant-step BDF2 is second-order convergent with a consistent start and selected roots Corollary
- Multivariable Taylor formula with o(‖h‖ᵏ) remainder Corollary
- A curved double well has an exact circular minimum-energy path Example
- A damped Newton step precedes the local quadratic phase Example
- A regularized logistic finite sum with an exact minimizer Example
- Boundary-incompatible forcing reduces Strang order to five quarters in a Dirichlet modal model Example
- Fixed-time error slopes for Euler, midpoint, and classical RK4 Example
- Forward Euler on the scalar linear equation y'=y Example
- RATTLE gives an exact step and a cubic phase defect for a free rigid bond Example
- A Cᵏ⁺ʳ residual vanishing through order r-1 has a Cᵏ scaled extension Lemma
- A finite formal logarithm has Hamiltonian coefficients on a star-shaped domain Lemma
- A fixed finite modified flow matches its method map to the stated Taylor order Lemma
- A Gaussian collocation defect has a high-order weighted endpoint bound Lemma
- A Hessian lower bound gives strong convexity and gradient-gap bounds Lemma
- A Sobolev function vanishing on scattered sites has an h^ν bound Lemma
- Analytic derivative bounds give exponential polynomial approximation on a triangle Lemma
- Atoms have uniformly bounded Hᵖ quasi-norm and uniformly bounded test pairings Lemma
- Collocation polynomial derivatives scale with the step size Lemma
- Forward-difference Jacobian error bound Lemma
- Level decomposition of an Hᵖ distribution produces atoms Lemma
- Modified Patankar Euler has a uniform first-order defect and one-step bound on positive tubes Lemma
- MPRK22(1) has a uniform second-order defect and one-step bound on positive tubes Lemma
- Paired force evaluations give a second-order Hessian-vector estimate Lemma
- Positive Hessians make Bregman divergence nonnegative Lemma
- Quadratic interpolation gives the variable-step BDF2 formula and cubic residual Lemma
- Rough composition on a flat closed set Lemma
- Sard on the infinitely flat critical stratum Lemma
- Second-order centered and unequal-step tangent estimates Lemma
- Stationary phase with a compactly supported amplitude Lemma
- Taylor moment conditions characterize the order of a linear multistep method Lemma
- The mini-element Fortin map approximates in L2 Lemma
- One-node Gauss collocation is implicit midpoint of order two Proposition
- Sufficient explicit Runge–Kutta order conditions through order four Proposition
- The selected two-stage SDIRK method has order two and is scalar L-stable Proposition
- Two-stage Radau IIA has order three and is scalar L-stable Proposition
- For 0<p<1 the Hᵖ functional is a quasi-norm, and Hᵖ is a quasi-Banach space Remark
- A corrected regret bound for agile mirror descent Theorem
- Armijo gradient descent has an explicit global linear rate Theorem
- Augmented RBF-FD weights reproduce polynomials and obey a local Taylor bound Theorem
- Backward Euler, the selected SDIRK, and two-stage Radau IIA converge at their stated orders under controlled stage residuals Theorem
…and 23 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MAT237 notes: Taylor's theorem in several variables (standard reference, not scraped)