How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Repeated derivatives along a line expand by the multinomial formula
Statement
Let , let be open, , and let be an open interval such that for every . Write for the canonical-natural map of The canonical natural of a field. For and every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated open-domain, open-interval, , and direction hypotheses.
A function with continuous first partial derivatives near a point is totally differentiable there, and the total chain rule then applies to the affine line map (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Ordered mixed derivatives through order commute under permutation (Continuous mixed partials of order are invariant under permutations).
The multi-index conventions , , , and the canonical derivative are those of maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space.
The canonical-natural map carries finite natural sums and products to the corresponding real sums and products (The canonical natural of a field, Laws of finite sums and products in , and ).
Proof
For the displayed sum consists of the zero multi-index and equals .
Fix and assume the formula at order .
Each with has continuous first partials, so [L1] differentiates its composition with the affine line. By [L3], we use the canonical multi-index notation for the resulting derivatives. When the resulting first derivatives are already canonical; when , [L2] permits the resulting derivatives to be written as . By [L4], collecting the coefficient of a fixed with gives
Thus the formula at order follows. [step 1.2, L1, L2, L3, L4, algebra]
Steps 1.1--2.1 prove the formula successively for every .
Depends on
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- Continuous mixed partials of order $k$ are invariant under permutations
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- Laws of finite sums and products in $\mathbb{N}$, and $\iota\big(\sum_{k<n} a_k\big) = \sum_{k<n} \iota(a_k)$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 102 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MAT237 notes: Taylor's theorem in several variables (standard reference, not scraped)