How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zero and one under multiplication
Statement
For all : , , and . Here , and the clause is definitional.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: multiplication and (Multiplication of natural numbers), and addition with and (Addition of natural numbers).
for all (Left identity for addition).
The induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Right unit : , using the multiplication recursion then [L1].
Base of the left inductions: and by the clause .
Inductive hypothesis: and .
Step: , using the hypothesis and (the instance of [L1]); and , where by the addition recursion and .
By induction [L2], and for all ; together with step 1.1, for all .
Depends on
Used by
- ⌈ m/n ⌉ for naturals m and n ≥ 1: the least q ∈ ℕ with m ≤ n q Definition
- Exponentiation of natural numbers, mⁿ, and its agreement with the integer power in ℝ Definition
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, ∑_k<n aₖ and ∏_k<n aₖ in ℕ Definition
- The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ Definition
- FALSE: for all sets A and B with B having at least two elements, A × B is strictly larger than A False statement
- A finite sum is unchanged by a permutation of its index range: ∑_k<n a_π(k) = ∑_k<n aₖ for every bijection π : n → n Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and products in ℕ, and ι(∑_k<n aₖ) = ∑_k<n ι(aₖ) Lemma
- Multiplication is commutative Lemma
- The naturals embed in the integers Lemma
- A finite set with n elements has exactly C(n, 2) two-element subsets, and 2C(n, 2) = n(n-1) Theorem
- ℕ × ℕ ≈ ℕ Theorem
- The integers form a commutative ring Theorem
- The integers form a totally ordered ring Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)