How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication
Statement
For all : (left distributivity) ; and (successor-left law) .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: multiplication , and addition , (Multiplication of natural numbers, Addition of natural numbers); in particular the addition recursion is available.
Addition is associative (Addition is associative) and commutative (Addition is commutative).
The induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Base : , using and .
Inductive hypothesis: .
Successor-left law , by a second induction on : base gives ; assuming , the step gives , using associativity and commutativity [L1] and .
Step: , using , the multiplication recursion, the hypothesis, associativity [L1], and .
By induction [L2], for all (hence all ) and for all .
Depends on
Used by
- lceil m/n rceil for naturals m and n ≥ 1: the least q ∈ ℕ with m ≤ n q Definition
- FALSE: for all sets A and B with B having at least two elements, A × B is strictly larger than A False statement
- Integer multiplication is well defined Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and products in ℕ, and ι(∑_k<n aₖ) = ∑_k<n ι(aₖ) Lemma
- Multiplication is associative Lemma
- Multiplication is commutative Lemma
- Order is compatible with multiplication Lemma
- For all m and n there is a list of mn pairwise distinct reals with no strictly increasing sublist of length m+1 and no strictly decreasing sublist of length n+1 Theorem
- ℕ × ℕ ≈ ℕ Theorem
- The integers form a commutative ring Theorem
- The integers form a totally ordered ring Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)