How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Addition is commutative
Statement
For all : .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Addition (Addition of natural numbers).
for all (Left identity for addition).
Left successor law: for all (Left successor law for addition).
Induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Base : and by [L1], so .
Inductive hypothesis: .
Step: by the recursion and the hypothesis; and the left successor law [L2] gives , so .
By induction [L3], for all , hence for all .
Depends on
Used by
- If V = bigoplus_i<n Uᵢ with every Uᵢ finite-dimensional, then V is finite-dimensional and dim_F V = ∑_i<n dim_F Uᵢ; in particular dim_F(U ⊕ W) = dim_F U + dim_F W Corollary
- A commutative monoid in which cancellation holds need not be a group: (ℕ, +) Counterexample
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, ∑_k<n aₖ and ∏_k<n aₖ in ℕ Definition
- lceil m/n rceil for naturals m and n ≥ 1: the least q ∈ ℕ with m ≤ n q Definition
- (ℤ, +) is an abelian group, (ℤ, ·) is a commutative monoid that is not a group, and its group of units is {1, -1} Example
- For every n ∈ ℕ there are n consecutive composite integers: with N := ∏_j<n(j+2), each of N+2, …, N+n+1 is composite Example
- nℤ is a subgroup of (ℤ, +) for every n ∈ ℤ, and every subgroup of (ℤ, +) has this form Example
- The subsets of ℕ containing a tail form the Fréchet filter, and it is proper and not an ultrafilter Example
- A finite sum is unchanged by a permutation of its index range: ∑_k<n a_π(k) = ∑_k<n aₖ for every bijection π : n → n Lemma
- Convergence depends only on the tail Lemma
- Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor Lemma
- Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication Lemma
- Exponent laws in a group: gᵐ⁺ⁿ = gᵐgⁿ and (gᵐ)ⁿ = gᵐⁿ for all m, n ∈ ℤ, and (gh)ⁿ = gⁿhⁿ **when g and h commute** Lemma
- Finite sums re-indexed along an injection, with a zero term deleted, and concatenated; and the closure properties of linear independence: an independent list is injective and never 0_V, its sublists are independent, a list is independent exactly when it is injective with linearly independent image, and every subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent Lemma
- In a finite group, every element g satisfies gⁿ = e for some natural n ≥ 1 Lemma
- Integer addition and negation are well defined Lemma
- Integer multiplication is well defined Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and products in ℕ, and ι(∑_k<n aₖ) = ∑_k<n ι(aₖ) Lemma
- Order is compatible with addition Lemma
- Order is compatible with multiplication Lemma
- The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation Lemma
- The p-adic valuation extends to the nonzero rationals by vₚ(a/b) := vₚ(a) - vₚ(b) ∈ ℤ, independently of the representation; it satisfies vₚ(xy) = vₚ(x) + vₚ(y), and vₚ(x+y) ≥ min{vₚ(x), vₚ(y)} whenever x, y and x+y are nonzero Lemma
- Trichotomy of the order on ℕ Lemma
- ≤ is a linear order on ℕ Theorem
- Division with remainder in ℤ: for a ∈ ℤ and b > 0 there are unique q, r ∈ ℤ with a = qb + r and 0 ≤ r < b Theorem
- For all m and n there is a list of mn pairwise distinct reals with no strictly increasing sublist of length m+1 and no strictly decreasing sublist of length n+1 Theorem
- For every forest, |V|=|E|+c, where c is the number of connected components Theorem
- For m ≥ 1 the number of weak compositions of n into m parts is binomn+m-1m-1, and the number of compositions is binomn-1m-1 for n ≥ 1 Theorem
- For n ≥ 1 and any injective list p : r → ℤ of primes containing every prime divisor of n, one has n = ∏_i<r pᵢ^ v_pᵢ(n); the exponents are determined by n, and v_q(n) = 0 for every prime q outside the list Theorem
- For positive integers a and b and every prime p: vₚ(gcd(a,b)) = min{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)} and vₚ(lcm(a,b)) = max{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)}; so the exponent-wise greatest common divisor is the gcd of the divisibility page and not a second notion Theorem
- Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either Theorem
- ℕ × ℕ ≈ ℕ Theorem
- The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality Theorem
- The dimension formula: for finite-dimensional linear subspaces U and W of V, the subspaces U + W and U ∩ W are finite-dimensional and dim_F(U+W) + dim_F(U ∩ W) = dim_F U + dim_F W Theorem
- The integers form a commutative ring Theorem
- The integers form a totally ordered ring Theorem
- The Steinitz exchange lemma: if L ⊆ V is linearly independent and S ⊆ V spans V with S finite of size n, then L is finite with |L| = m ≤ n, and there is T ⊆ S of size n - m such that L ∪ T spans V Theorem
- The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with | A ∪ B| = | A| + | B| and |⋃_i ∈ I Aᵢ| = ∑_i ∈ I| Aᵢ|, and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 17 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mathematical induction (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)