Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

(Z,+) is an abelian group, (Z,⋅) is a commutative monoid that is not a group, and its group of units is {1,−1}

Example

Let Z be the integers with the operations of Arithmetic on the integers. Then

  1. (Z,+,0) is an abelian group (Group and abelian group);
  2. (Z,⋅,1) is a commutative monoid (Semigroup and monoid) which is not a group, because 0 has no multiplicative inverse;
  3. its group of units (The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation) is Z×={1,−1}, and 1≠−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The integers Z with +, ⋅, 0 and 1 (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, Arithmetic on the integers), and the embedding ι:N→Z of The naturals embed in the integers.

[L1]

In Z: addition is associative and commutative, x+0=x, and every x=[(a,b)] has the additive inverse −x=[(b,a)] with x+(−x)=0; multiplication is associative and commutative with x⋅1=x, and it distributes over addition. These are the ring axioms, verified one by one in the proof of The integers form a commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).

[L2]

The order on Z is total, antisymmetric and transitive, is compatible with addition, and positives are closed under multiplication (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L3]

ι is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the nonnegative integers; ι(0)=0 and ι(1)=1 (The naturals embed in the integers).

[L4]

On N: every k≠0 is a successor σ(j)=1+j, so k≠0 implies 1≤k (Every nonzero natural number is a successor, Addition is commutative, Order on the natural numbers, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Addition on Z is associative and commutative, x+0=x and hence 0+x=x, and every x has a two-sided additive inverse −x; so (Z,+,0) is an abelian group.

L1L5
1.2

Multiplication on Z is associative and commutative and x⋅1=x=1⋅x; so (Z,⋅,1) is a commutative monoid.

L1L5
1.3

For every y∈Z, 0⋅y=0: by distributivity 0⋅y=(0+0)⋅y=0⋅y+0⋅y, and adding −(0⋅y) gives 0=0⋅y.

L1
1.4

1≠0 in Z: ι is injective with ι(1)=1 and ι(0)=0, and 1≠0 in N since 1=σ(0) contains 0 as an element while 0=∅ has none.

L3L4
1.5

Discreteness in Z: if 0<x then 1≤x. Indeed x≥0 gives x=ι(k) with k∈N, and k≠0 since ι(0)=0≠x; so 1≤k in N and, ι preserving the order, 1=ι(1)≤ι(k)=x.

L3L4
2.1

0 is not invertible in (Z,⋅,1): 0⋅y=0≠1 for every y. Hence (Z,⋅,1) is not a group.

step 1.3step 1.4L5
2.2

1 and −1 are units: 1⋅1=1, and (−1)(−1)=1 because (−1)(−1)+(−1)=(−1)((−1)+1)=(−1)⋅0=0, so (−1)(−1) is the additive inverse of −1, which is 1.

step 1.3L1
2.3

If 0<u and 1≤v then u≤uv: from 1≤v we get 0≤v−1, so u(v−1)≥0, either factor being possibly zero, and uv−u=u(v−1)≥0 gives u≤uv.

step 1.5L1L2
2.4

Let xy=1. Then x≠0 and y≠0 by step 1.3 and step 1.4. If x>0 and y<0 then 0<x(−y)=−(xy)=−1, so 1<0, contradicting 0<1, which holds by step 1.4 and totality since 1≥0; the case x<0, y>0 is the same with the names interchanged. So x and y are both positive or both negative.

step 1.3step 1.4L1L2L3
3.1

Both positive: 1≤x and 1≤y by step 1.5, so x≤xy=1 by step 2.3, and with 1≤x antisymmetry gives x=1.

step 1.5step 2.3L2
4.1

Both negative: then 0<−x and 0<−y and (−x)(−y)=xy=1 by ring arithmetic, so −x=1 by step 3.1, that is x=−1.

step 3.1L1L2
5.1

By steps 2.2, 2.4, 3.1 and 4.1 the units of (Z,⋅,1) are exactly 1 and −1; and 1≠−1, since 1=−1 would give 1+1=0, while 0<1 gives 1<1+1 and hence 0<1+1. So Z×={1,−1}, a group under multiplication with two elements.

step 2.2step 2.4step 3.1step 4.1L1L2L5∎

Remarks

  • The Statement of The integers form a commutative ring is quoted here by its content, not by its name. That theorem says Z is "a commutative ring with multiplicative identity", a phrase not defined at this point in the reading order; what is used above is the list of equations its proof verifies one at a time. Nothing here presupposes a definition of a ring.

  • Cancellation without invertibility. (Z,⋅) satisfies cancellation by nonzero elements yet is not a group, and (N,+) is a sharper example still, being cancellative outright (A commutative monoid in which cancellation holds need not be a group: (N,+)).

  • Z×={1,−1} is the first finite group in the library that is not trivial. It is cyclic of order 2, generated by −1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources