How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a linear order on
Statement
The relation on , where (Order on the natural numbers), is a linear (total) order: reflexive, antisymmetric, transitive, and total.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The order (Order on the natural numbers) and addition with , (Addition of natural numbers).
and addition is associative (Left identity for addition, Addition is associative).
Cancellation: (Addition is cancellative).
Every nonzero natural is a successor: if then for some (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).
Trichotomy: exactly one of , , holds (Trichotomy of the order on ).
Addition is commutative (Addition is commutative).
for every (Peano axiom P1) (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).
Proof
Reflexive: , so .
Transitive: if and , say and , then , so .
A sum is zero only if both summands are: if with then and [L6], a contradiction, so .
Total: by trichotomy one of , , holds, and each of these gives or .
Antisymmetric: if and , say and , then ; commuting both sides [L5] gives , and cancelling the common right summand [L2] gives , hence by step 1.3 and .
Reflexivity, antisymmetry, transitivity, and totality all hold, so is a linear order on .
Depends on
Used by
- ℝ((t⁻¹)) has the nested interval property for lengths tending to 0 Corollary
- Stolz-Cesaro, 0/0 form: if bₖ is strictly decreasing to 0, aₖ → 0, and the difference quotient converges, then aₖ/bₖ converges to the same value Corollary
- (ℕ, ≤) has no maximal element: Zorn's chain hypothesis fails Counterexample
- A progressive map with no fixed point, on a poset that is not chain-complete Counterexample
- A sequence with limsup = +∞: the greatest subsequential limit exists only in overlineℝ Counterexample
- Null times divergent has no rule: xₖ = 1/k with yₖ = ck gives product limit c, and with yₖ = k² gives divergence Counterexample
- A summability (Toeplitz) matrix, the transformed sequence yₙ = ∑ₖ c_n,k xₖ, and regularity Definition
- Nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone, and eventually monotone sequences Definition
- The characteristic of a ring: the least n ≥ 1 with n · 1_R = 0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise Definition
- Well-order and well-ordered set Definition
- A positive sequence making all three inequalities of the ratio-to-root chain strict Example
- F^ℕ is a vector space and the eventually zero families form a linear subspace of it that is the span of the standard unit families Example
- min is a choice function on ℕ Example
- The 2-adic absolute value gives an ultrametric on ℚ, in which every triangle is isosceles and every point of a ball is a centre Example
- The block sequence 1/1; 1/2, 2/2; 1/3, 2/3, 3/3; … has subsequential limit set exactly [0,1] Example
- The standard unit families eₖ ∈ F^ℕ form a basis of the linear subspace of eventually zero families: an explicit infinite basis, built with no choice principle Example
- The subsets of ℕ containing a tail form the Fréchet filter, and it is proper and not an ultrafilter Example
- FALSE, once the ultrafilter lemma is available: every ultrafilter is principal False statement
- FALSE: every bounded sequence converges False statement
- FALSE: limits preserve strict inequalities False statement
- A Cauchy sequence with a convergent subsequence converges, to that subsequence’s limit Lemma
- A sequence has at most one limit Lemma
- A strictly increasing index map satisfies nₖ ≥ k Lemma
- An ordered field with the least-upper-bound property has the nested interval property and is Archimedean Lemma
- Cauchy completeness plus the Archimedean property imply the monotone convergence property Lemma
- Convergence depends only on the tail Lemma
- Every Cauchy sequence of reals is bounded Lemma
- Every convergent sequence is bounded Lemma
- Every convergent sequence is Cauchy Lemma
- Every real sequence has a monotone subsequence (the peak / rising-sun lemma) Lemma
- Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable Lemma
- Finite sums re-indexed along an injection, with a zero term deleted, and concatenated; and the closure properties of linear independence: an independent list is injective and never 0_V, its sublists are independent, a list is independent exactly when it is injective with linearly independent image, and every subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent Lemma
- For a prime p and a nonzero integer a: p^vₚ(a) ∣ a and p^vₚ(a)+1 ∤ a; pᵏ ∣ a holds exactly for k ≤ vₚ(a); vₚ(a) ≥ 1 exactly when p ∣ a; vₚ(1) = vₚ(-1) = 0; and vₚ(p) = 1 Lemma
- For every a > 0, a^1/n → 1 Lemma
- For every p > 0 and every positive rational α, n^α/(1+p)ⁿ → 0 Lemma
- For every real x, xᵏ/k! → 0 Lemma
- If xₖ ≤ yₖ eventually then limsup xₖ ≤ limsup yₖ and liminf xₖ ≤ liminf yₖ Lemma
- liminf xₖ ≤ limsup xₖ for every real sequence Lemma
- Limits preserve non-strict inequalities Lemma
- n^1/n → 1 Lemma
…and 37 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 22 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)