Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every a>0, a1/n→1

Statement

Let a∈R with a>0, write ι(n):=n⋅1R for the canonical natural (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing) and a1/n for the n-th root (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Rational powers ar of a positive base), defined for naturals n≥1. Then:

  1. for every real b≥1 and every natural n≥1, 1  ≤  b1/n  ≤  1+b−1ι(n);
  2. the sequence ck:=a1/(k+1), k∈N, converges to 1 (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

Index range. As for the previous lemma on this page, a1/n requires n≥1, so the sequence indexed by N (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences) is the shifted family a1/(k+1); it is the classical family a1/n, n≥1, reindexed by n=k+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real a>0; the canonical naturals ι(n)=n⋅1R for n≥1; and the sequence ck:=a1/(k+1).

[L1]

Roots: for real x≥0 and natural n≥1 there is a unique real s≥0 with sn=x, written x1/n; it is >0 when x>0, and 11/n=1 by uniqueness (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Integer powers am).

[L2]

Rational powers: x1/n is the rational power at exponent 1/n; for rational t>0, x>1 implies xt>1; and (xy)1/n=x1/ny1/n for x,y>0 (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar, Laws of rational exponents).

[L3]

Bernoulli's inequality: (1+x)n≥1+ι(n)x for x≥−1 and n∈N (Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n≥1+nx).

[L4]

Canonical naturals: ι(n)>0 and invertible for n≥1, and ι is strictly increasing (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Order on the natural numbers, ≤ is a linear order on N).

[L5]

Reciprocal Archimedean property: for every real η>0 there is a natural p≥1 with 1/p<η; and 0<x<y gives 0<1/y<1/x (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε, Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L6]

Order arithmetic: inequalities may be added and translated, and multiplying an inequality by a positive element preserves it; the order is total, so exactly one of a<1, a=1, a>1 holds (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L7]

Squeeze theorem; a constant sequence converges to its value; to establish convergence it suffices to produce a threshold for every real ε>0 (The squeeze theorem, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

[L8]

Algebra of limits, reciprocal rule: if zj→z with z≠0 and zj≠0 for every j, then 1/zj→1/z (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Let b be any real with b≥1 and let n≥1 be a natural. If b=1 then b1/n=1 and both inequalities hold. If b>1 then 1/n is a positive rational, so t:=b1/n−1>0; Bernoulli's inequality applied to t≥−1 gives b=(b1/n)n=(1+t)n≥1+ι(n)t, hence ι(n)t≤b−1 and t≤(b−1)/ι(n) since ι(n)>0. In both cases 1≤b1/n≤1+(b−1)/ι(n), which is claim 1.

givenL1L2L3L4L6
1.2

Case one: a=1.

givenassume-case one
1.3

Case big: a>1.

givenassume-case big
1.4

Case small: 0<a<1.

givenassume-case small
2.1

For every real b>1 the sequence b1/(k+1) converges to 1. Put dk:=1+(b−1)/ι(k+1). Given a real ε>0, the quotient ε/(b−1) is positive, so there is a natural p≥1 with 1/p<ε/(b−1); for k≥p we have k+1>p, hence ι(k+1)>ι(p)>0 and 0<(b−1)/ι(k+1)<(b−1)(1/p)<ε, so ∣dk−1∣<ε and dk→1. By step 1.1 applied at n=k+1 we have 1≤b1/(k+1)≤dk for every k, and the constant sequence 1 converges to 1, so the squeeze theorem gives b1/(k+1)→1.

step 1.1L4L5L6L7
2.2

In case one, ck=11/(k+1)=1 for every k, so (ck) is the constant sequence 1 and converges to 1.

step 1.2L1L7
3.1

In case big, a>1, so step 2.1 applied with b=a gives ck=a1/(k+1)→1.

step 2.1step 1.3
3.2

In case small, put a′:=1/a, which satisfies a′>1 because 0<a<1. For each natural n≥1 the product rule for roots gives a1/n(a′)1/n=(aa′)1/n=11/n=1, so a1/n=1/(a′)1/n, and (a′)1/n>0. By step 2.1 the sequence (a′)1/(k+1) converges to 1≠0 with all terms nonzero, so the reciprocal rule gives ck=1/(a′)1/(k+1)→1/1=1.

step 2.1step 1.4L1L2L5L8
4.1

The three cases are exhaustive by trichotomy applied to a and 1, the hypothesis a>0 excluding nothing else, and in each of them (ck) converges to 1; together with step 1.1 this proves both claims.

step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2step 1.1L6cases: trichotomy of the ordercases-exhaustive∎

Remarks

  • Bernoulli is doing the whole job in the case a>1. The inequality (1+t)n≥1+nt converts the exact identity (a1/n)n=a into the linear bound t≤(a−1)/n on the excess t=a1/n−1, and that bound is what tends to 0. No estimate on a1/n itself is needed beyond a1/n>1.

  • The case 0<a<1 is not symmetric to the case a>1 and is not proved again. It is transported by the reciprocal, using a1/n(1/a)1/n=1 (Laws of rational exponents) and the reciprocal rule of Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients. The hypothesis of that rule, that the limit be nonzero and every term nonzero, is met because roots of positive reals are positive.

  • The rate is different from the one in n1/n→1. Here the excess is O(1/n) with a constant depending on a; there the base itself grows with n and the excess is only O(1/n1/2). The two lemmas are therefore not instances of one another in either direction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources