Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Laws of rational exponents

Statement

Let a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} with a,b>0a, b > 0 and let r,sQr, s \in \mathbb{Q}, with rational powers as in Rational powers ara^r of a positive base. Then:

  1. ar>0a^{r} > 0.
  2. ar+s=arasa^{r+s} = a^{r} a^{s}.
  3. (ab)r=arbr(ab)^{r} = a^{r} b^{r}; in particular (ab)1/N=a1/Nb1/N\big(ab\big)^{1/N} = a^{1/N} b^{1/N} for every natural N1N \ge 1.
  4. ar=(ar)1=1/ara^{-r} = \big(a^{r}\big)^{-1} = 1/a^{r}.
  5. (ar)s=ars\big(a^{r}\big)^{s} = a^{rs}.

Claims 2 and 3 persist in the supplementary case of Rational powers ara^r of a positive base: for a,b0a, b \ge 0 and rationals r,s>0r, s > 0 (Order on the rationals) one still has (ab)r=arbr(ab)^{r} = a^{r} b^{r} and ar+s=arasa^{r+s} = a^{r} a^{s}. The two identities degenerate differently, and it is worth saying how. In the product identity, a zero base on either side makes both sides 00. In the addition identity only the base aa occurs, so it degenerates only when a=0a = 0, and then both sides are 00; when a>0a > 0 that identity holds with no hypothesis on bb at all.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a,b>0a, b > 0 and rationals r,sr, s.

[L1]

Definition and well-definedness (Rational powers ara^r of a positive base, Rational powers do not depend on the representative): for ANY representative r=m/Nr = m/N with mZm \in \mathbb{Z} and N1N \ge 1 natural, ar=(a1/N)ma^{r} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m}; and a1/Na^{1/N} is the unique x0x \ge 0 with xN=ax^{N} = a (Existence and uniqueness of nn-th roots: a unique a1/n0a^{1/n} \ge 0 with (a1/n)n=a(a^{1/n})^n = a), which is >0> 0 when a>0a > 0.

[L2]

Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ama^m): for x,y0x, y \ne 0 and integers j,kj, k, xj+k=xjxkx^{j+k} = x^{j}x^{k}, (xj)k=xjk(x^{j})^{k} = x^{jk}, (xy)j=xjyj(xy)^{j} = x^{j}y^{j} and xj=(xj)1x^{-j} = (x^{j})^{-1}.

[L3]

Positivity and injectivity: x>0x > 0 implies xj>0x^{j} > 0 for every NATURAL jj (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n, claim 1), and hence for every integer jj, since xj=(xj)1x^{-j} = \big(x^{j}\big)^{-1} (Laws of integer exponents, claim 2) and the inverse of a positive element is positive (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); and xxNx \mapsto x^{N} is injective on {x0}\{x \ge 0\} for N1N \ge 1 (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n, claim 2).

[L4]

Rational arithmetic (Arithmetic on the rationals, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): any two rationals can be written with a common positive denominator, m/N+k/N=(m+k)/Nm/N + k/N = (m+k)/N, (m/N)=(m)/N-(m/N) = (-m)/N, and (m/n)(p/q)=(mp)/(nq)(m/n)(p/q) = (mp)/(nq).

[L5]

The order on Q\mathbb{Q} (The rationals form a totally ordered field, Order on the rationals) is compatible with addition, so r>0r > 0 and s>0s > 0 imply r+s>0r + s > 0.

[L6]

The supplementary clause of Rational powers ara^r of a positive base: 0t=00^{t} = 0 for every rational t>0t > 0, while 0t0^{t} is left undefined for rational t<0t < 0 and the convention 00=10^{0} = 1 of Integer powers ama^m is untouched. In a field, a product with a factor 00 is 00 (Multiplication by zero: 0a=00 \cdot a = 0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a common denominator: there are a natural N1N \ge 1 and integers m,km, k with r=m/Nr = m/N and s=k/Ns = k/N; then r+s=(m+k)/Nr + s = (m+k)/N and r=(m)/N-r = (-m)/N.

L4
1.2

Roots of a product: for a,b>0a, b > 0 and N1N \ge 1 the element a1/Nb1/Na^{1/N} b^{1/N} is positive and satisfies (a1/Nb1/N)N=(a1/N)N(b1/N)N=ab\big(a^{1/N} b^{1/N}\big)^{N} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{N}\big(b^{1/N}\big)^{N} = ab, so by uniqueness of the nonnegative NN-th root (ab)1/N=a1/Nb1/N\big(ab\big)^{1/N} = a^{1/N} b^{1/N}.

L1L2L3
2.1

Claim 1: ar=(a1/N)ma^{r} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m} with a1/N>0a^{1/N} > 0, and a positive element has positive integer powers, so ar>0a^{r} > 0.

step 1.1L1L3
2.2

Claim 3: (ab)r=((ab)1/N)m=(a1/Nb1/N)m=(a1/N)m(b1/N)m=arbr(ab)^{r} = \big((ab)^{1/N}\big)^{m} = \big(a^{1/N} b^{1/N}\big)^{m} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m}\big(b^{1/N}\big)^{m} = a^{r} b^{r}, using the root-of-a-product identity and then the integer product law.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2
3.1

Claim 2: ar+s=(a1/N)m+k=(a1/N)m(a1/N)k=arasa^{r+s} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m+k} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m}\big(a^{1/N}\big)^{k} = a^{r} a^{s}, the middle equality being the integer addition law applied to the nonzero base a1/Na^{1/N}.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L2
3.2

Claim 4: ar=(a1/N)m=((a1/N)m)1=(ar)1a^{-r} = \big(a^{1/N}\big)^{-m} = \Big(\big(a^{1/N}\big)^{m}\Big)^{-1} = \big(a^{r}\big)^{-1}.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L2
3.3

Claim 5: write r=m/nr = m/n and s=p/qs = p/q with n,q1n, q \ge 1, and put x:=a1/(nq)x := a^{1/(nq)}, so x>0x > 0 and xnq=ax^{nq} = a; then (xq)n=xqn=a\big(x^{q}\big)^{n} = x^{qn} = a with xq>0x^{q} > 0, so xq=a1/nx^{q} = a^{1/n} by uniqueness of the nonnegative nn-th root; putting z:=xmz := x^{m} we get z>0z > 0 and zq=(xm)q=(xq)m=(a1/n)m=arz^{q} = \big(x^{m}\big)^{q} = \big(x^{q}\big)^{m} = \big(a^{1/n}\big)^{m} = a^{r}, so zz is the nonnegative qq-th root of ara^{r}, that is z=(ar)1/qz = \big(a^{r}\big)^{1/q}; therefore (ar)s=((ar)1/q)p=zp=(xm)p=xmp=(a1/(nq))mp=a(mp)/(nq)=ars\big(a^{r}\big)^{s} = \Big(\big(a^{r}\big)^{1/q}\Big)^{p} = z^{p} = \big(x^{m}\big)^{p} = x^{mp} = \big(a^{1/(nq)}\big)^{mp} = a^{(mp)/(nq)} = a^{rs}.

step 2.1L1L2L3L4
3.4

The supplementary nonnegative case, product identity: let a,b0a, b \ge 0 and let r>0r > 0 be rational; if a>0a > 0 and b>0b > 0 this is step 2.2, and otherwise a=0a = 0 or b=0b = 0, so ab=0ab = 0 and the left side is 0r=00^{r} = 0, while the right side arbra^{r}b^{r} has a factor 0r=00^{r} = 0 and is therefore 00 as well.

step 2.2L6
4.1

The supplementary nonnegative case, addition identity: the identity ar+s=arasa^{r+s} = a^{r}a^{s} involves the base aa only, so nothing need be assumed about bb; for a>0a > 0 it is step 3.1 verbatim, which uses only a>0a > 0, and both sides are then positive rather than 00; for a=0a = 0 the exponents satisfy r+s>0r + s > 0, so the left side is 0r+s=00^{r+s} = 0 and the right side is 00=00 \cdot 0 = 0.

step 3.1L5L6
5.1

All five claims hold for positive bases and arbitrary rational exponents, together with the two supplementary identities for nonnegative bases and positive rational exponents.

step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 2.2step 3.3step 3.4step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 25 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources