How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Laws of rational exponents
Statement
Let with and let , with rational powers as in Rational powers of a positive base. Then:
- .
- .
- ; in particular for every natural .
- .
- .
Claims 2 and 3 persist in the supplementary case of Rational powers of a positive base: for and rationals (Order on the rationals) one still has and . The two identities degenerate differently, and it is worth saying how. In the product identity, a zero base on either side makes both sides . In the addition identity only the base occurs, so it degenerates only when , and then both sides are ; when that identity holds with no hypothesis on at all.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Reals and rationals .
Definition and well-definedness (Rational powers of a positive base, Rational powers do not depend on the representative): for ANY representative with and natural, ; and is the unique with (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ), which is when .
Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ): for and integers , , , and .
Positivity and injectivity: implies for every NATURAL (Monotonicity of and of , claim 1), and hence for every integer , since (Laws of integer exponents, claim 2) and the inverse of a positive element is positive (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); and is injective on for (Monotonicity of and of , claim 2).
Rational arithmetic (Arithmetic on the rationals, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): any two rationals can be written with a common positive denominator, , , and .
The order on (The rationals form a totally ordered field, Order on the rationals) is compatible with addition, so and imply .
The supplementary clause of Rational powers of a positive base: for every rational , while is left undefined for rational and the convention of Integer powers is untouched. In a field, a product with a factor is (Multiplication by zero: ).
Proof
Choose a common denominator: there are a natural and integers with and ; then and .
Roots of a product: for and the element is positive and satisfies , so by uniqueness of the nonnegative -th root .
Claim 1: with , and a positive element has positive integer powers, so .
Claim 3: , using the root-of-a-product identity and then the integer product law.
Claim 2: , the middle equality being the integer addition law applied to the nonzero base .
Claim 4: .
Claim 5: write and with , and put , so and ; then with , so by uniqueness of the nonnegative -th root; putting we get and , so is the nonnegative -th root of , that is ; therefore .
The supplementary nonnegative case, product identity: let and let be rational; if and this is step 2.2, and otherwise or , so and the left side is , while the right side has a factor and is therefore as well.
The supplementary nonnegative case, addition identity: the identity involves the base only, so nothing need be assumed about ; for it is step 3.1 verbatim, which uses only , and both sides are then positive rather than ; for the exponents satisfy , so the left side is and the right side is .
All five claims hold for positive bases and arbitrary rational exponents, together with the two supplementary identities for nonnegative bases and positive rational exponents.
Depends on
- Rational powers $a^r$ of a positive base
- Rational powers do not depend on the representative
- Laws of integer exponents
- Existence and uniqueness of $n$-th roots: a unique $a^{1/n} \ge 0$ with $(a^{1/n})^n = a$
- Arithmetic on the rationals
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Order on the rationals
- The rationals form a totally ordered field
- Multiplication by zero: $0 \cdot a = 0$
Used by
- ∑ k^-1/2 diverges and ∑ k⁻² converges, and both have root limit exactly 1 Counterexample
- x ↦ √x on (0,1] is differentiable with unbounded derivative and is not Lipschitz there, so the boundedness hypothesis in the Lipschitz corollary cannot be dropped Counterexample
- The p-norms ‖ x‖ₚ for rational p ≥ 1, and ‖ x‖_∞ Definition
- √· on [0,∞) is uniformly continuous and exactly 1/2-Hölder, and is not Lipschitz Example
- A positive sequence making all three inequalities of the ratio-to-root chain strict Example
- Condensation reduces ∑ 1/kᵖ to a geometric series with ratio 2¹⁻ᵖ Example
- Convergence range of x⁻ᵖ(1+x)^-q on (0,∞) for rational exponents Example
- For a natural n ≥ 1, the derivative of x ↦ x^1/n on (0,∞) is 1/ι(n)x^1/n - 1, obtained from the inverse rule applied to x ↦ xⁿ; in particular (√x)' = 1/(ι(2)√x) Example
- H(x) = 2√x on [0,1]: H is continuous, H' is unbounded on (0,1], and H' is therefore not Riemann integrable Example
- On [0,1] the function x^β is β-Hölder and is α-Hölder for no rational α > β, so the Hölder classes are strictly nested Example
- The integral test applied to ∑ 1/ι(k+1)ᵖ for rational p>0, cross-checked against the published p-series theorem Example
- The mean value theorem gives |√x - √y| ≤ 1/ι(2) |x - y| for x, y ≥ 1, so the square root is Lipschitz with constant 1/2 on [1,∞) Example
- The substitution x=1/t exchanges the two rational p-tests Example
- Young's theorem integrates a Hölder function of unbounded variation against itself Example
- FALSE: limsup aₖ^1/k = limsup aₖ₊₁/aₖ for every positive sequence False statement
- A normal sequence of entourages yields a uniformly continuous pseudometric with controlled dyadic balls Lemma
- Each ‖·‖ₚ is a norm on ℝⁿ, and the induced metrics are exactly d₁, d₂ and d_∞ of the published metric-spaces page Lemma
- For every a > 0, a^1/n → 1 Lemma
- For every p > 0 and every positive rational α, n^α/(1+p)ⁿ → 0 Lemma
- Monotonicity of r ↦ aʳ and of a ↦ aʳ Lemma
- n^1/n → 1 Lemma
- Truncated integrals of rational powers Lemma
- Young's partition estimate for rational Hölder exponents Lemma
- Why real exponents are deferred on the rational-powers page Remark
- Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent Theorem
- For aₖ > 0: liminf aₖ₊₁/aₖ ≤ liminf aₖ^1/k ≤ limsup aₖ^1/k ≤ limsup aₖ₊₁/aₖ Theorem
- For rational p > 0, ∑ 1/kᵖ converges iff p > 1 Theorem
- Gauss: for positive terms, if aₖ/aₖ₊₁ = 1 + h/k + rₖ with |rₖ| ≤ C k^-1-ε for k ≥ 1, some constant C and some rational ε > 0, the series converges iff h > 1 Theorem
- Hölder's inequality for finite sums (rational exponents) Theorem
- If |f(x) - f(y)| ≤ C|x-y|^α on an interval for some rational α > 1 then f is constant Theorem
- Minkowski's inequality for finite sums (rational exponent) Theorem
- Root test: limsup |aₖ|^1/k < 1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, > 1 gives divergence, and = 1 decides nothing Theorem
- The exponential definition of real powers agrees with the existing rational powers Theorem
- The improper p-test for rational exponents Theorem
- Weighted AM-GM inequality with rational weights Theorem
- Young's inequality for products (rational conjugate exponents) Theorem
- Young's Riemann–Stieltjes existence theorem for rational Hölder exponents Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 25 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I (standard reference, not scraped)
- Radicals and rational exponents (Emory University) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Exponentiation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §5.6 (standard reference, not scraped)