Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every p>0 and every positive rational α, nα/(1+p)n→0

Statement

Let p∈R with p>0 and let α∈Q with α>0. Write ι(n):=n⋅1R for the canonical natural, with ι(0):=0, and let

wk  :=  ι(k)α(1+p)k(k∈N),

the numerator being a rational power (Rational powers ar of a positive base) and the denominator an integer power (Integer powers am). Then wk→0 (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

Every term is defined, including the one at k=0. The supplementary clause of Rational powers ar of a positive base gives 0α=0 for rational α>0, and (1+p)0=1, so w0=0. No index shift is therefore needed here, in contrast with the two root lemmas earlier on this page, where the exponent is the index.

In words: a fixed power of n is beaten by any geometric sequence of ratio >1, however small the excess p and however large the exponent α.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real p>0 and a rational α>0; the base β:=1+p>1; the canonical naturals ι(n)=n⋅1R with ι(0)=0; and wk=ι(k)α/βk.

[L1]

Rational powers: xr is defined and positive for real x>0 and rational r, and 0r=0 for rational r>0; the integer power xm is the rational power at exponent m; (xy)r=xryr, which persists for x,y≥0 when r>0; x−r=1/xr; and (xr)s=xrs (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Laws of rational exponents, Integer powers am, Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a).

[L2]

Monotonicity of rational powers: for rational t>0, x>1 implies xt>1; and for rational t>0, 0<x<y implies xt<yt (Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar).

[L3]

Integer powers: x>0 implies xm>0, and xmxm′=xm+m′, (xm)m′=xmm′ for integer exponents with x≠0 (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, Laws of integer exponents).

[L4]

Bernoulli's inequality: (1+x)n≥1+ι(n)x for real x≥−1 and natural n (Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n≥1+nx).

[L5]

Canonical naturals: ι(n)>0 and invertible for n≥1, and ι is strictly increasing (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Order on the natural numbers, ≤ is a linear order on N).

[L6]

Reciprocal Archimedean property: for every real η>0 there is a natural m≥1 with 1/m<η; and 0<x<y gives 0<1/y<1/x (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε, Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L7]

Order arithmetic: Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities and claim 4 of Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication state the strict forms, that inequalities may be translated and added and that multiplication by a positive element preserves <; adjoining the case of equality gives the nonstrict forms used below. Products of nonnegative inequalities multiply in the nonstrict form stated by Multiplying inequalities of positives, and the order is total (Ordered field).

[L8]

Convergence to 0: it suffices to produce, for every real ε>0, a threshold beyond which ∣zk∣<ε; and ∣z∣=z for z≥0 (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since α>0 is rational, so is 1/α; put δ:=β1/α and θ:=δ1/2. From β>1 and 1/α>0 we get δ>1, and from δ>1 and 1/2>0 we get θ>1; hence θ−1>0 and δ>0, θ>0.

givenL1L2L7
1.2

For every natural n one has δn=θnθn, because θ2=(δ1/2)2=δ and therefore δn=(θ2)n=θ2n=θnθn.

givenL1L3
1.3

For every natural k one has wk=ukα, where uk:=ι(k)/δk. Indeed uk=ι(k)⋅(1/δk) with both factors ≥0, so ukα=ι(k)α(1/δk)α=ι(k)α/(δk)α, and (δk)α=δkα=(β1/α)kα=β(1/α)(kα)=βk.

givenL1L3
2.1

For every natural n≥1 one has 0≤un<1/(ι(n)(θ−1)(θ−1)). Bernoulli's inequality applied to θ−1>0 gives θn≥1+ι(n)(θ−1)>ι(n)(θ−1)>0, so multiplying this inequality by itself gives δn=θnθn>ι(n)(θ−1)ι(n)(θ−1)>0; dividing the positive ι(n) by the two positive quantities reverses the inequality and yields un=ι(n)/δn<ι(n)/(ι(n)ι(n)(θ−1)(θ−1))=1/(ι(n)(θ−1)(θ−1)), while un≥0 because ι(n)>0 and δn>0.

step 1.1step 1.2L3L4L5L6L7
3.1

The sequence (uk) converges to 0. Note first u0=ι(0)/δ0=0/1=0. Given a real ε>0, put η:=ε(θ−1)(θ−1)>0 and take a natural m≥1 with 1/m<η. For k≥m we have ι(k)≥ι(m)>0, hence 1/ι(k)≤1/ι(m)<η, and therefore 0≤uk<1/(ι(k)(θ−1)(θ−1))<η/((θ−1)(θ−1))=ε, so ∣uk∣<ε.

step 2.1L5L6L7L8
4.1

The sequence (wk) converges to 0. Given a real ε>0, the element ε1/α is a positive real, so by step 3.1 there is a threshold beyond which 0≤uk<ε1/α. For such k: if uk=0 then wk=0α=0<ε, and if uk>0 then monotonicity of the rational power α in the base gives wk=ukα<(ε1/α)α=ε(1/α)α=ε. In both cases ∣wk∣=wk<ε, so wk→0.

step 3.1step 1.3L1L2L8∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources