How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For every real ,
Statement
Write for the canonical natural (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing) and define the factorial as the finite product (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion)
so that , the empty product, and . Every is a positive real. Then, for every ,
the numerator being the integer power of Integer powers and the convergence that of Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals.
The index range needs no adjustment: is defined at with value , and , so the sequence begins with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real ; the modulus ; the factorials ; and the canonical naturals .
denotes the statement , where , and are fixed in step 1.3.
Finite products: the empty product is , , and a product of positive factors is positive (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Integer powers: , , and implies (Integer powers , Monotonicity of and of , Laws of integer exponents).
Absolute value: , , and for (Basic properties of the absolute value).
Induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).
Canonical naturals: and invertible for , is strictly increasing, and for every real there is a natural with (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Order on the natural numbers, is a linear order on ).
Order arithmetic: Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, claim 4 of Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication and Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities state the strict forms, that gives , that multiplication by a positive element preserves , and that inequalities may be translated and added; adjoining the case of equality gives the nonstrict forms used below, and multiplication by sends both sides to , so a nonnegative multiplier preserves . Products of nonnegative inequalities multiply in the nonstrict form stated by Multiplying inequalities of positives.
Geometric sequences: implies (For the sequence is null, and for the sequence diverges to ); a scalar multiple of a convergent sequence converges to the scalar multiple of the limit (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).
Squeeze theorem, and the fact that a constant sequence converges to its value (The squeeze theorem, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).
A sequence converges to if and only if some tail of it does; the -th tail of is (Convergence depends only on the tail, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).
Proof
Each is a product of the positive reals , , hence positive, and ; also .
For every one has : at both sides are , and if then , so this follows by induction on .
Take a natural with and put and . Then , since and , and .
The statement holds, with equality: .
Fix and assume , that is .
Then holds. Indeed , and gives , hence ; since also by step 1.5 and , multiplying the two nonnegative inequalities gives .
By the induction principle holds for every , and always, so for every .
Since , the sequence converges to , hence so does ; the constant sequence also converges to , so the squeeze theorem applied to step 3.1 shows that the -th tail converges to , and therefore converges to . Finally by steps 1.1 and 1.2, so .
Remarks
-
The threshold is chosen so that the ratio is bounded by a constant less than . Beyond index each further factor of the factorial is at least , so multiplying by and dividing by that factor shrinks the term by at least the factor . That is the entire mechanism: a factorial eventually beats a geometric sequence because its ratios, unlike a geometric sequence's, tend to .
-
No halving is used. Many texts take with ; here it is enough to take with , which the Archimedean property supplies directly and which keeps every quantity a ratio of things already in hand.
-
The case is not special. Then , and the bound reads for , which is correct since those terms are ; and converges to because , so For the sequence is null, and for the sequence diverges to applies unchanged.
-
This is the strongest of the three standard comparisons on this page. For every and every positive rational , says a power is beaten by a geometric sequence; this says every geometric sequence, that is every fixed , is beaten by the factorial. Instances are worked in The four standard limits , , and , computed ↗.
Depends on
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Laws of integer exponents
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- For $|r| < 1$ the sequence $r^k$ is null, and for $|r| > 1$ the sequence $|r|^k$ diverges to $+\infty$
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
- The squeeze theorem
- Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients
- Convergence depends only on the tail
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- Multiplying inequalities of positives
- Order on the natural numbers
- $\le$ is a linear order on $\mathbb{N}$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 93 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Factorial (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §6.5 (standard reference, not scraped)