Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The four standard limits n1/n→1, a1/n→1, nα/(1+p)n→0 and xk/k!→0, computed

Example

The four standard limits of this page, written as sequences on N and instantiated. Throughout ι(n)=n⋅1R is the canonical natural, with ι(0)=0.

classical formas a sequence on Nvaluesource
n1/n→1(k+1)1/(k+1)1n1/n→1
a1/n→1, a>0a1/(k+1)1For every a>0, a1/n→1
nα/(1+p)n→0ι(k)α/(1+p)k0For every p>0 and every positive rational α, nα/(1+p)n→0
xk/k!→0xk/k!0For every real x, xk/k!→0

Two of the four need an index shift and two do not, and the reason is visible in the classical forms: in the first two the index sits in the exponent as 1/n, which is not a rational number at n=0, so those families begin at n=1 and are written here with n=k+1. In the last two the index sits in the base or in a factorial, both of which are defined at 0, so no shift is needed and the sequences begin at k=0 with the values 0 and 1 respectively.

The instances computed below are:

21/(k+1)→1,ι(k)22k→0,2kk!→0,(−3)kk!→0,ι(k)2k!→0.

The last of these is not one of the four; it is the composite that orders the three scales, and it is obtained from two of them by the product rule.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The canonical naturals ι(n)=n⋅1R with ι(0)=0; the factorial k!=∏j<kι(j+1) of For every real x, xk/k!→0; rational powers (Rational powers ar of a positive base) and integer powers (Integer powers am).

[L1]

(k+1)1/(k+1)→1, with 1≤n1/n≤1+2/n1/2 for every natural n≥1 (n1/n→1).

[L2]

For every real a>0, a1/(k+1)→1; and for real b≥1 and natural n≥1, 1≤b1/n≤1+(b−1)/ι(n) (For every a>0, a1/n→1).

[L3]

For every real p>0 and rational α>0, ι(k)α/(1+p)k→0 (For every p>0 and every positive rational α, nα/(1+p)n→0).

[L4]

For every real x, xk/k!→0 (For every real x, xk/k!→0).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The first standard limit gives (k+1)1/(k+1)→1, together with the explicit two-sided bound 1≤(k+1)1/(k+1)≤1+2/(k+1)1/2 valid at every k∈N, since k+1≥1.

givenL1
1.2

The second gives 21/(k+1)→1 and (1/2)1/(k+1)→1, both bases being positive; for the first of these the explicit bound of [L2] with b=2 reads 1≤21/n≤1+1/ι(n) for every natural n≥1.

givenL2L6
1.3

The third, with p=1 and α=2, gives ι(k)2/2k→0; with p=1/2 and α=1/2 it gives ι(k)1/2/(3/2)k→0. Both p are positive reals and both α are positive rationals, so [L3] applies in each case.

givenL3L6
1.4

The fourth, with x=2 and with x=−3, gives 2k/k!→0 and (−3)k/k!→0; no hypothesis on x is needed, in particular no positivity.

givenL4
2.1

Multiplying the first limit of step 1.3 by the first of step 1.4 and using 2k≠0 gives ι(k)2/k!=(ι(k)2/2k)(2k/k!)→0⋅0=0.

step 1.3step 1.4L5L6
2.2

Multiplying the limit of step 1.1 by the first of step 1.2 gives (k+1)1/(k+1) 21/(k+1)→1⋅1=1.

step 1.1step 1.2L5
3.1

The four limits and the two composites are therefore established as displayed, and together they order the three growth scales: a fixed power of n is beaten by every geometric sequence of ratio >1 by step 1.3, every geometric sequence is beaten by the factorial by step 1.4, and consequently a fixed power of n is beaten by the factorial by step 2.1.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2∎

Remarks

  • The two bounds quoted in steps 1.1 and 1.2 are the useful part in practice. They convert the qualitative statement into a rate: n1/n is within 2/n1/2 of 1, and a1/n within (a−1)/n of 1 when a≥1. The second rate is faster, and the difference is real: in n1/n the base itself grows with the index.

  • Why α is rational and p is real. The exponent α must be rational because rational powers are all this library has; the base 1+p may be any real >1 because it is raised only to integer powers. The asymmetry is a fact about what has been constructed, not about the mathematics, and it disappears once real exponents are available.

  • The composite in step 2.1 is the one usually quoted as "factorials beat polynomials". It is not proved directly anywhere on this page: it is the product of two of the four standard limits, and the product rule (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients) is what assembles it.

  • Nothing here uses lim sup⁡. All four are ordinary limits, and the page's machinery is needed only to prove them, not to state them; the connection to the rest of the page is that For ak>0: lim inf⁡ak+1/ak≤lim inf⁡ak1/k≤lim sup⁡ak1/k≤lim sup⁡ak+1/ak is the tool that makes several of them routine once one of them is known.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources