Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a

Statement

Let R be a complete ordered field (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)). For every a∈R with a≥0 and every n∈N with n≥1 there is a unique s∈R with s≥0 and sn=a (Integer powers am); we write

s=a1/n=an.

Moreover a1/n>0 when a>0, and a1/1=a.

This generalises the published Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, and the case n=2 is not new. That theorem already produces the unique a≥0 with (a)2=a, and it is cited as such throughout the library; the notation a1/2 introduced here is the same number. What is new is the passage to general n: the completed square that drives the n=2 argument has no direct analogue, and its place is taken by the factorisation of bn−an and the resulting Lipschitz estimate (Factorisation of bn−an, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complete ordered field R (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)), that is, an ordered field (Ordered field) with the least-upper-bound property; an element a≥0; and a natural n≥1, with ι(n)∈R written n (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field).

[L1]

Least-upper-bound property: every nonempty subset of R that is bounded above (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set) has a least upper bound, and it is unique, so the notation sup⁡S is legitimate (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Suprema and infima are unique).

[L2]

Epsilon characterisation of the supremum: if S is nonempty and bounded above and u=sup⁡S, then for every ε>0 there is t∈S with u−ε<t (Epsilon characterisation of the supremum).

[L3]

Monotonicity of powers (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an): x↦xn is strictly increasing on {x≥0} for n≥1, hence injective there; x≥0 implies xn≥0 and x>0 implies xn>0; and x≥1 implies xn≥x.

[L4]

Lipschitz estimate (Factorisation of bn−an, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate): if 0≤x≤y≤B and n≥1 then 0≤yn−xn≤nB n−1(y−x).

[L5]

Order arithmetic: adding a constant preserves the order and for c>0, x<y  ⟺  cx<cy (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication), both stated there for the STRICT order alone, so where a ≤ is added or scaled below the move is that statement together with the case of equality, settled by trichotomy (Ordered field); 1>0, which is proved in The multiplicative identity is positive and stated by none of those three, hence 2=1+1>0; and 0<2−1<1, since 0<1<2 gives 0<2−1<1−1=1 (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, claim 2).

[L6]

Trichotomy: for x,y∈R exactly one of x<y, x=y, y<x holds; consequently any two elements have a minimum (Ordered field).

[L7]

A product with a zero factor vanishes: 0⋅x=x⋅0=0 (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

If a=0 then s=0 satisfies s≥0 and sn=0=a, since 0n=0n−1⋅0=0 for n≥1; so existence holds in that case and we assume a>0 from here on.

givenL3L7algebra
1.2

Uniqueness holds as soon as a root exists: if u,v≥0 satisfy un=vn, then strict monotonicity of x↦xn on the nonnegatives rules out both u<v and v<u, so u=v by trichotomy.

L3L6
1.3

Define S={t∈R:t≥0 and tn≤a}; then 0∈S, because 0≥0 and 0n=0≤a, so S is nonempty.

givenL3L7
1.4

The element M:=1+a is an upper bound of S: since a>0 and 1>0 we have M>1 and M>a, so any t>M satisfies t>1, whence tn≥t>M>a and t∉S.

givenL3L5
2.1

By the least-upper-bound property s:=sup⁡S exists in R; moreover s≥0 because 0∈S, and s≤M because M is an upper bound and s is the least one.

L1step 1.3step 1.4
3.1

Put B:=M+1=a+2; then B>M≥1>0, so B n−1>0 and nB n−1>0, and every x with 0≤x≤M+1 satisfies 0≤x≤B.

step 2.1L3L5
3.2

Assume, for contradiction, that sn≠a; by trichotomy either sn<a or sn>a.

assume-contrastep 2.1L6
4.1

(Case sn<a.) Put δ:=min⁡{1,(a−sn)(nB n−1)−1}, which is >0 since a−sn>0 and nB n−1>0, and put h:=2−1δ, so that 0<h<δ≤1 and h<(a−sn)(nB n−1)−1; then 0≤s≤s+h≤M+1=B, so the Lipschitz estimate gives (s+h)n−sn≤nB n−1h<a−sn, hence (s+h)n<a and s+h∈S, while s+h>s contradicts that s is an upper bound of S.

assume-case lowstep 3.2step 2.1step 3.1L4L5L6choose
4.2

(Case sn>a.) Here s>0, since s=0 would give sn=0≤a; put δ:=min⁡{s,(sn−a)(nB n−1)−1}>0 and h:=2−1δ, so that 0<h<s and h<(sn−a)(nB n−1)−1; then 0≤s−h≤s≤B, so the Lipschitz estimate gives sn−(s−h)n≤nB n−1h<sn−a, hence (s−h)n>a; applying the epsilon characterisation with ε=h produces t∈S with t>s−h≥0, whence tn>(s−h)n>a by strict monotonicity, contradicting t∈S.

assume-case highstep 3.2step 2.1step 3.1L2L3L4L5L6L7choose
5.1

Both cases of the disjunction in step 3.2 are impossible, so the assumption fails and sn=a; this s is the unique nonnegative n-th root of a by step 1.2, it satisfies s>0 when a>0 because s=0 would force a=sn=0, and at n=1 the element a itself is a nonnegative solution of s1=a, so a1/1=a; writing a1/n=an for it, the case n=2 recovers the already published a of Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}.

step 4.1step 4.2step 3.2step 1.2step 1.1L3L7casesdischarge-contradiction∎

Depends on

Used by

…and 29 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources