How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiplication by zero:
Statement
In any field (Field), for every we have .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Proof
Since , we have .
By distributivity, .
Since is the additive identity, .
Combining the two expressions for gives .
From steps 1.3 and 2.1, .
Cancelling from both sides yields , that is .
Depends on
Used by
- Bias-corrected Adam update Algorithm
- Bias-corrected AMSGrad update Algorithm
- Diagonal AdaGrad for online convex losses Algorithm
- RMSProp with an exponential second-moment estimate Algorithm
- Uncorrected Adam for online convex losses Algorithm
- Uncorrected AMSGrad with a coordinatewise historical maximum Algorithm
- ∑_k<n+1C(n, k) = 2ⁿ, and ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏiotaC(n, k) = 0 for n ≥ 1 Corollary
- AM-GM fails for negative entries: (-1,-4) has geometric mean 2 and arithmetic mean -5/2 Counterexample
- The union of the two coordinate axes of F² is closed under scalar multiplication and is not closed under addition, so neither closure condition implies the other Counterexample
- Three lines in F² that meet pairwise only in 0 and whose sum is F² with decompositions that are not unique, so pairwise trivial intersection does not give a direct sum Counterexample
- Integer powers aᵐ Definition
- (0,1) + (2,3) = (2,4), with supremum 4 = sup(0,1) + sup(2,3) Example
- A regularized logistic finite sum with an exact minimizer Example
- A signed Simpson-Smolyak weight makes a nonnegative chaos coefficient estimate negative Example
- Duplicate columns and explicit zeros count as stored entries Example
- Equispaced interpolation of Runge's function diverges Example
- F^ℕ is a vector space and the eventually zero families form a linear subspace of it that is the span of the standard unit families Example
- Five finite AM-GM proofs, with the same sharp equality case Example
- Five finite proofs of Bernoulli, with rational exponents and the quadratic refinement Example
- Geometric sequences: the complete classification for every real ratio Example
- In F³ the three coordinate lines are linear subspaces whose internal direct sum is F³, and F⁰ is the zero space Example
- Positive type on a discrete group: the identity mass, characters, and the regular GNS model Example
- sup{q ∈ ℚ : q > 0, q² < 2} = √2 in ℝ, and no supremum in ℚ Example
- The two-term Lagrange identity and Cauchy-Schwarz Example
- Two planes in F³ whose sum is F³ and whose intersection is a line, computed explicitly Example
- FALSE: ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏiotaC(n, k) = 0 for every n ∈ ℕ False statement
- FALSE: a^m/n := (a^1/n)ᵐ extends to negative bases False statement
- FALSE: every real number has a real square root False statement
- FALSE: the supremum of a set belongs to the set False statement
- FALSE: The union of two linear subspaces is a linear subspace False statement
- A cone generated by finitely many Euclidean vectors is closed Lemma
- A field has no zero divisors: ab = 0 ⟹ a = 0 or b = 0 Lemma
- A finite coefficient vector has a canonical polynomial representative Lemma
- A finite positive-spanning poll set has a positive uniform angle Lemma
- A real coefficient list of degree d has at most d real roots Lemma
- Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)ⁿ ≥ 1 + nx Lemma
- Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees Lemma
- Complex modulus restricts to real absolute value Lemma
- Finite group-relative updates preserve admissibility and have bounded oracle calls Lemma
- Finite-metric transport and normalized dual optima are attained Lemma
…and 21 more results.
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Spivak, Calculus, 4th ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Janssen and Lindsey, Rings with Inquiry: Fields (standard reference, not scraped)