LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)audited 2026-07-25
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiplication by zero:
Statement
In any field (Field), for every we have .
Facts & Assumptions
Proof
technique · direct
1.1L1
Since , we have .
1.2L1
By distributivity, .
1.3L1
Since is the additive identity, .
2.1step 1.1step 1.2
Combining the two expressions for gives .
3.1step 1.3step 2.1
From steps 1.3 and 2.1, .
4.1step 3.1L2∎
Cancelling from both sides yields , that is .
Depends on
Used by
- ∑_k<n+1binomnk = 2ⁿ, and ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for n ≥ 1 Corollary
- The union of the two coordinate axes of F² is closed under scalar multiplication and is not closed under addition, so neither closure condition implies the other Counterexample
- Three lines in F² that meet pairwise only in 0 and whose sum is F² with decompositions that are not unique, so pairwise trivial intersection does not give a direct sum Counterexample
- Integer powers aᵐ Definition
- (0,1) + (2,3) = (2,4), with supremum 4 = sup(0,1) + sup(2,3) Example
- F^ℕ is a vector space and the eventually zero families form a linear subspace of it that is the span of the standard unit families Example
- In F³ the three coordinate lines are linear subspaces whose internal direct sum is F³, and F⁰ is the zero space Example
- sup{q ∈ ℚ : q > 0, q² < 2} = √2 in ℝ, and no supremum in ℚ Example
- Two planes in F³ whose sum is F³ and whose intersection is a line, computed explicitly Example
- FALSE: ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for every n ∈ ℕ False statement
- FALSE: a^m/n := (a^1/n)ᵐ extends to negative bases False statement
- FALSE: every real number has a real square root False statement
- FALSE: the supremum of a set belongs to the set False statement
- FALSE: The union of two linear subspaces is a linear subspace False statement
- A field has no zero divisors: ab = 0 ⟹ a = 0 or b = 0 Lemma
- Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)ⁿ ≥ 1 + nx Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and finite products Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and products in ℕ, and ι(∑_k<n aₖ) = ∑_k<n ι(aₖ) Lemma
- Laws of rational exponents Lemma
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication Lemma
- Sign rules for products: (-a)b = -(ab) and (-a)(-b) = ab Lemma
- Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives Lemma
- Supremum of a scalar multiple Lemma
- Supremum of a sumset: sup(S + T) = sup S + sup T Lemma
- The sign of a product Proposition
- Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a^1/n ≥ 0 with (a^1/n)ⁿ = a Theorem
- ℍ is a division ring that is not commutative, hence not a field: q⁻¹ = bar q / N(q) for q ≠ 0, while ij = k and ji = -k Theorem
- The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality Theorem
- The binomial theorem in ℝ: (x+y)ⁿ = ∑_k<n+1 ιbinomnk xᵏ y^ n-k Theorem
- The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 1 result over 1 level. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Spivak, Calculus, 4th ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Janssen and Lindsey, Rings with Inquiry: Fields (standard reference, not scraped)