Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In F3 the three coordinate lines are linear subspaces whose internal direct sum is F3, and F0 is the zero space

Example

Let F be a field (Field) and consider the vector space F3 of functions 3→F with the pointwise operations (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}). Since 3={0,1,2} (The natural numbers N (von Neumann), On N the order is membership: m<n  ⟺  m∈n), an element is written x=(x0,x1,x2) with xi:=x(i), indexed from 0. For j<3 let ej∈F3 be given by ej(j)=1F and ej(i)=0F for i≠j, and put

Lj  :=  { x∈F3  :  xi=0F for every i<3 with i≠j }.

Then:

  1. Lj={ λej:λ∈F }=span⁡{ej}, so each Lj is a linear subspace of F3 (Linear subspace of a vector space, Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S);
  2. F3=⨁j<3Lj (Internal direct sum V=⨁i<nUi: the sum is everything and each summand meets the sum of the others only in 0V), the unique decomposition of x∈F3 being x=x0e0+x1e1+x2e2;
  3. F0 is the zero space: it has exactly one element, the empty function.

The sets Lj are called the coordinate lines of F3; the word "line" is used informally, since dimension is not available here and nothing below uses it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, the vector space F3 of functions 3→F with pointwise operations, the vectors ej for j<3, and the sets Lj as displayed.

[L1]

FX is a vector space over F with (x+y)(i)=x(i)+y(i), (λx)(i)=λx(i) and zero the constant function at 0F; for X=n a natural number, n={0,…,n−1}; and F0 has exactly one element, the empty function, which is its zero vector (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}, Vector space over a field, The natural numbers N (von Neumann), On N the order is membership: m<n  ⟺  m∈n).

[L3]

The elements of ∑i<nUi are exactly the ∑i<nui with ui∈Ui; and ∑i<3ui=(u0+u1)+u2, by the recursion ∑i<0ui=0 and ∑i<σ(m)ui=(∑i<mui)+um together with 0+u0=u0 (The sum U+W of two linear subspaces and the sum ∑i<nUi of a finite family).

[L5]

In a field: 1Fλ=λ, multiplication is commutative, 0Fλ=0F (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0) and hence λ0F=0F, and 0F is the additive identity (Field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

F3 is the set of functions 3→F with the pointwise operations, and 3={0,1,2}, so the coordinates of an element are x0,x1,x2.

L1
1.2

Each ej is an element of F3, and each Lj is a subset of F3, both by their displayed descriptions.

L1L5
1.3

Lj={ λej:λ∈F } for every j<3. If λ∈F then (λej)j=λ1F=λ and (λej)i=λ0F=0F for i≠j, so λej∈Lj. Conversely if x∈Lj then x and xjej have the same value at every i<3, namely xj at i=j and 0F elsewhere, so x=xjej.

L1L5
1.4

For u0,u1,u2∈F3 the finite sum is ∑j<3uj=(u0+u1)+u2, whose value at i<3 is (u0(i)+u1(i))+u2(i), by the pointwise definition of the addition.

L1L3
1.5

F0 has exactly one element, the empty function, and that element is its zero vector, so F0 is the zero space; this is claim 3.

L1
2.1

Each Lj is a linear subspace of F3 and equals span⁡{ej}: by step 1.3 it is the set of scalar multiples of ej, which is exactly the span of {ej}, and a span is a linear subspace. This is claim 1.

step 1.3L2
2.2

Every x∈F3 decomposes. Put uj:=xjej, which lies in Lj by step 1.3. The value of ∑j<3uj at i<3 is (x0e0(i)+x1e1(i))+x2e2(i); since ej(i)=0F for j≠i and ei(i)=1F, exactly one summand is xi and the others are 0F, so the value is xi. Hence ∑j<3uj=x, and ∑j<3Lj=F3.

step 1.3step 1.4L1L5
3.1

The decomposition is unique. Suppose uj∈Lj for j<3 and ∑j<3uj=x. Evaluating at i<3 gives (u0(i)+u1(i))+u2(i)=xi, and uj(i)=0F whenever j≠i, so the left-hand side is ui(i); thus ui(i)=xi, and step 1.3 gives ui=ui(i)ei=xiei. So the list is the one of step 2.2.

step 1.3step 1.4L1L5
4.1

By steps 2.2 and 3.1 every x∈F3 is ∑j<3uj with uj∈Lj in exactly one way, so F3=⨁j<3Lj, and the decomposition is x=x0e0+x1e1+x2e2. This is claim 2.

step 2.2step 3.1L4
5.1

Claim 1 is step 2.1, claim 2 is step 4.1 and claim 3 is step 1.5.

step 1.5step 2.1step 4.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources