Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FN is a vector space and the eventually zero families form a linear subspace of it that is the span of the standard unit families

Example

Let F be a field (Field) and let FN be the function space of all families x:N→F with the pointwise operations (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}), written x=(xn)n∈N with xn:=x(n); the index runs over N, which contains 0 (The natural numbers N (von Neumann)). Put

E  :=  { x∈FN  :  there is N∈N with xn=0F for every n≥N },

the set of eventually zero families, and for k∈N let ek∈FN be the standard unit family given by ek(k)=1F and ek(n)=0F for n≠k. Then:

  1. E is a linear subspace of FN (Linear subspace of a vector space);
  2. E=span⁡{ ek:k∈N } (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S);
  3. E≠FN, the constant family at 1F lying outside E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, the vector space FN with pointwise operations, the set E of eventually zero families, and the families ek for k∈N.

[L1]

FX is a vector space over F with (x+y)(n)=x(n)+y(n), (λx)(n)=λx(n), and zero the constant family at 0F; two elements are equal exactly when they agree at every point (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}, Vector space over a field).

[L2]

One-step test: a nonempty subset closed under λu+v is a linear subspace, and a linear subspace satisfies (W1), (W2), (W3) (One-step subspace test: a nonempty W⊆V is a linear subspace if and only if λu+v∈W for all λ∈F and u,v∈W, Linear subspace of a vector space).

[L3]
[L6]

The order of N is total and reflexive, m<σ(N) is equivalent to m≤N, and m<n implies m≠n (≤ is a linear order on N, Order on the natural numbers, On N the order is membership: m<n  ⟺  m∈n).

[L7]

In a field: 0Fλ=0F (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0) and multiplication is commutative, so λ0F=0F; λ1F=λ; 0F+0F=0F and 0F is the additive identity; and 1F≠0F (Field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

FN is a vector space over F, being the function space on the index set N, and its zero is the constant family at 0F.

L1
1.2

E is nonempty: the zero family has xn=0F for every n, so N=0 witnesses that it lies in E.

L1
1.3

E is closed under the one-step expression. Let λ∈F and u,v∈E, with witnesses N1 for u and N2 for v. The order of N is total, so one of N1,N2 is at least the other; let N be that one. For n≥N we have n≥N1 and n≥N2, hence (λu+v)n=λun+vn=λ0F+0F=0F. So N witnesses λu+v∈E.

L1L6L7
1.4

Each ek lies in E: if n≥σ(k) then k<n, so n≠k and ek(n)=0F; thus σ(k) is a witness.

L6L7
1.5

For x∈FN and N∈N, the finite sum sN:=∑k<Nxkek satisfies sN(n)=xn for n<N and sN(n)=0F for N≤n. By induction on N: at N=0 the sum is the zero family, there is no n<0, and the second clause holds. Assuming it at N, we have sσ(N)=sN+xNeN, so sσ(N)(n)=sN(n)+xNeN(n); for n<N this is xn+xN0F=xn, since n≠N; for n=N it is 0F+xN1F=xN; and for σ(N)≤n we have N≤n and n≠N, so it is 0F+xN0F=0F. As n<σ(N) is equivalent to n≤N, this is the claim at σ(N).

L1L4L5L6L7
1.6

The constant family c with cn=1F for every n does not lie in E: for any candidate witness N we have N≥N and cN=1F≠0F. Hence E≠FN, which is claim 3.

L1L6L7
2.1

E is a linear subspace of FN, by the one-step test applied to steps 1.2 and 1.3; this is claim 1.

step 1.2step 1.3L2
2.2

If x∈E with witness N, then x=∑k<Nxkek. Indeed the two families agree at every n: at n<N both are xn, and at N≤n the sum is 0F while xn=0F by the choice of N. So x is a linear combination of elements of { ek:k∈N }.

step 1.5L1
3.1

Claim 2. By step 2.2 every element of E is a linear combination of elements of { ek:k∈N }, hence lies in its span. Conversely each ek lies in E by step 1.4 and E is a linear subspace by step 2.1, so the span, being the smallest linear subspace containing all the ek, is contained in E.

step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2L3
4.1

Claim 1 is step 2.1, claim 2 is step 3.1 and claim 3 is step 1.6.

step 1.6step 2.1step 3.1∎

Remarks

  • The spanning set is infinite and every combination is finite. The span of an infinite set consists of the vectors built from finitely many of its elements (span⁡(S) is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of S, and span⁡(∅)={0V}), which is exactly why the span of all the ek is the eventually zero families and not all of FN. Claim 3 is the concrete form of that distinction.

  • No topology and no convergence are involved. "Eventually zero" is a purely algebraic condition on a family indexed by N: some tail is identically 0F. Nothing here needs an order or a metric on F, and F is an arbitrary field.

  • The witness N is not unique and nothing above assumes it is. If N witnesses that x is eventually zero then so does every larger natural number, which is what makes the argument in step 1.3 work: two families are handled by taking the larger of their witnesses.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources