Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: ∑k<n+1(−1)kι ⁣(nk)=0 for every n∈N

Statement

FALSE. The statement

∑k<n+1(−1)k ι(nk)=0

for every n∈N.

The claim is what a text whose natural numbers begin at 1 would state truly. In this library N contains 0 (The natural numbers N (von Neumann)), and the statement acquires a counterexample at its very first index.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

∑k<0uk=0 and ∑k<σ(N)uk=∑k<Nuk+uN (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L3]

a0=1 for every real a, including a=0; and 0 m=0 for m≥1 (Integer powers am, Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0, Field).

[L4]

The true statement: ∑k<n+1(−1)kι(nk)=0 for n≥1 (∑k<n+1(nk)=2n, and ∑k<n+1(−1)kι ⁣(nk)=0 for n≥1, clause 2), proved from the binomial theorem at x=−1, y=1 (The binomial theorem in R: (x+y)n=∑k<n+1ι ⁣(nk) xky n−k).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Evaluate the left-hand side at n=0. The sum runs over k<0+1=1, so by [L1] it is the single term (−1)0 ι(00).

givenL1
2.1

That term is 1: (−1)0=1 by [L3], (00)=1 by [L2], and ι(1)=1. So the sum equals 1, not 0, and the displayed statement is false at n=0.

step 1.1L2L3
3.1

Where the hypothesis is spent in the true version. [L4] obtains the identity by evaluating the binomial theorem at x=−1, y=1: the left-hand side becomes (−1+1)n=0 n, which is 0 only for n≥1, while 00=1 by [L3]. That single evaluation is the entire difference between the true statement and the false one.

step 2.1L3L4∎

Remarks

  • The convention 00=1 is not the culprit. It is what makes the binomial theorem itself true at n=0 and at x=0, with no exceptional case; the price is that one of its corollaries carries a hypothesis. Changing the convention would move the exception, not remove it.

  • The concrete picture. In Pascal's triangle computed to row 6, with Pascal's rule checked at every interior entry the alternating sums of rows 1 to 6 are all 0 and the alternating sum of row 0 is 1. A reader who computes from row 1 onwards sees only the true pattern.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources