How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient
Definition
For a finite set and put
the set of -element subsets of . Every is finite (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ), so the condition makes sense for every subset.
is finite. It is a subset of , which is finite by for finite , so A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if applies.
depends only on . Let be a bijection of finite sets. The direct image map carries into , because restricted to is a bijection of onto and so by the transport clause of The cardinality of a finite set; the map is its two-sided inverse, since and for a bijection . So and the two have the same cardinality.
Definition. For set
the binomial coefficient. By the previous paragraph and ,
is a count, so it is a natural number by construction. It is not defined as : that expression involves a division, hence lives in , and the assertion that its value is a natural number is a theorem, proved in for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and . Defining the coefficient as a count makes integrality free and leaves the closed formula something to prove.
Boundary values, read off the definition and not stipulated.
- for every , including : the subsets of of cardinality are exactly the subsets equal to (The cardinality of a finite set, clause (b)), so , a one-element set. No empty-product convention is involved.
- : if has then by clause 3 of A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , so .
- for : a subset has by clause 2 of A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , so is impossible and (Trichotomy of the order on ).
- : a subset of cardinality is for exactly one , since means ; so its unique element is a bijection .
- and for , both instances of the above.
Remarks
-
Notation. is standard for the set of -element subsets; it is unrelated to the notation for a set of functions, which appears on this page as well. Where confusion is possible the words are used in full.
-
Symmetry is not visible yet. is proved in for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and by exhibiting the complementation bijection ; from the definition alone there is no reason for the two counts to agree.
-
is a legitimate value of and of . Every boundary clause above is checked at , which is where a statement about binomial coefficients most often goes wrong in this library's index convention.
Depends on
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- $\lvert\mathcal{P}(A)\rvert = 2^{\lvert A\rvert}$ for finite $A$
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- Equinumerous sets, $A \approx B$ and $A \preceq B$
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Order on the natural numbers
- On $\mathbb{N}$ the order is membership: $m < n \iff m \in n$
- Trichotomy of the order on $\mathbb{N}$
Used by
- ∑_k<n+1binomnk = 2ⁿ, and ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for n ≥ 1 Corollary
- A symmetric chain decomposition gives a second proof of Sperner's bound Corollary
- R(s,t)≤ R(s-1,t)+R(s,t-1) for s,t≥2, and R(k,k)≤binom2k-2k-1≤2²ᵏ⁻² Corollary
- Sperner's theorem and its equality cases: a largest antichain is a complete middle level Corollary
- Two sets of the same finite cardinality between which the bijection is not unique Counterexample
- When k<n<2k, the entire kth level is intersecting and exceeds the Erdős-Ko-Rado star bound Counterexample
- A finite family (Aᵢ)_i ∈ I of subsets of a finite set X, the intersections A_J for J ⊆ I, and the convention A_∅ = X Definition
- Intersecting uniform families of finite sets Definition
- The Bernstein polynomial Bₙ(f) on [0,1] Definition
- The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels Definition
- The lower and upper shadows of a uniform set family Definition
- The multinomial coefficient binomnk₀,…,kₘ₋₁ as the number of ordered partitions of an n-set into blocks of prescribed sizes Definition
- All 8 functions 3 → 2, the 0 injections 3 → 2, and the 8 subsets of a 3-element set Example
- All k-sets through a fixed point form an intersecting family attaining the Erdős-Ko-Rado bound Example
- Choosing a committee: binom103 = 120, and the ordered count 10^underline3 = 720 Example
- Five-card hands from a 52-card deck: binom525 = 2598960, and the count of hands with all cards of one suit Example
- For a finite symmetric irreflexive relation the sum of the neighbour counts is twice the number of unordered related pairs Example
- Pascal's triangle computed to row 6, with Pascal's rule checked at every interior entry Example
- The 15 weak compositions of 4 into 3 parts, listed and matched against stars and bars Example
- The sieve run in full on three explicit finite sets and then on four, with every nonempty intersection listed Example
- The surjections from a five-element set onto a three-element set counted by the sieve formula and by direct subtraction Example
- Vandermonde's identity checked at m = 4, n = 3, k = 3, both sides equal to 35 Example
- FALSE: ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for every n ∈ ℕ False statement
- False: the Erdős-Ko-Rado bound holds without the hypothesis n≥ 2k False statement
- FALSE: the number of weak compositions of n into m parts is binomn+m-1m-1 for every m ∈ ℕ False statement
- FALSE: truncating the sieve at a fixed depth of at least two gives the exact size of the union False statement
- ∑_j<m+1(-1)ʲ ιbinomtj = (-1)ᵐ ιbinomt-1m for every t ≥ 1 and every m Lemma
- For fixed k, binomnk/nᵏ tends to 1/k! Lemma
- The binomial coefficients are symmetric and increase to the middle level before decreasing Lemma
- The binomial theorem over the complex field Lemma
- Conventions fixed on this page, and what counting is deliberately not done here Remark
- Scope, endpoint, factorial, and deferred-remainder conventions Remark
- A finite set with n elements has exactly binomn2 two-element subsets, and 2binomn2 = n(n-1) Theorem
- binomnk k! (n-k)! = n! for k ≤ n; hence binomnk k! = n^underlinek, the quotient n!/(k!(n-k)!) is a natural number, and binomnk = binomnn-k Theorem
- Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem: for 1≤ k and n≥ 2k, an intersecting family of k-subsets of an n-set has size at most binomn-1k-1, and a star attains the bound Theorem
- Erdős's finite counting bound R(k,k)>2^k/2 for every k≥3 Theorem
- Finite binomial formulas for cos(nθ) and sin(nθ) Theorem
- Finite graph Ramsey theorem: binoms+t-2s-1→(s,t)² for all positive s,t Theorem
- For m ≥ 1 the number of weak compositions of n into m parts is binomn+m-1m-1, and the number of compositions is binomn-1m-1 for n ≥ 1 Theorem
- Inclusion and exclusion: ι|⋃_i ∈ I Aᵢ| = ∑_∅ ≠ J ⊆ I(-1)^| J| + 1 ι| A_J|, together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the Aᵢ Theorem
…and 11 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 59 results over 27 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Binomial coefficient (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Combination (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Vol. 1, Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)