Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Five-card hands from a 52-card deck: (525)=2598960, and the count of hands with all cards of one suit

Example

Model a deck as the set D:=13×4, a rank paired with a suit, so ∣D∣=52 by The product rule: ∣A×B∣=∣A∣ ∣B∣, and ∣∏i<mAi∣=∏i<m∣Ai∣. A hand is a five-element subset of D, that is an element of [D]5. Then

∣[D]5∣=(525)=2598960,

and the number of hands all of whose cards share a suit is

4⋅(135)=4⋅1287=5148.

No probability is claimed anywhere. There is no probability space in this library at this point in the reading order; these are counts of sets, and nothing below divides one by another or calls a count a chance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The deck D=13×4; for s<4 the suit Ds:=13×{s}; and the falling factorials computed from n0‾=1 and nσ(k)‾=nk‾(n−k) (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N).

[L4]

Cancellation by a nonzero natural (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3

The deck has ∣D∣=∣13∣⋅∣4∣=13⋅4=52 by [L3], and a hand is by definition an element of [D]5, so the number of hands is (525) by [L1].

2.1step 1.1L2L4

The total. By [L2], (525)⋅5!=525‾=52⋅51⋅50⋅49⋅48. Computing the falling factorial step by step: 52⋅51=2652, 2652⋅50=132600, 132600⋅49=6497400, 6497400⋅48=311875200. Since 5!=120 and 120⋅2598960=311875200, cancellation by 120 gives (525)=2598960.

2.2step 1.1L1L2L3L4

The single-suit hands. Let F be the set of hands all of whose cards lie in one suit, and for s<4 let Fs be the set of hands contained in Ds. The Fs are pairwise disjoint, since a hand has five cards and cannot lie in two different suits at once, and their union is F. Each Ds=13×{s} is in bijection with 13 under the first projection, so ∣Fs∣=∣[Ds]5∣=(135) by [L1]. By [L2], (135)⋅120=135‾=13⋅12⋅11⋅10⋅9=154440, and 120⋅1287=154440, so (135)=1287. Finally [L3] gives ∣F∣=∑s∈4∣Fs∣=4⋅1287=5148.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

So there are 2598960 hands in all, of which 5148 have all five cards of one suit. Both numbers are cardinalities of explicitly described sets, and neither is a probability.

Remarks

  • The sum rule is doing real work in step 2.2, and its hypothesis is checked rather than assumed: two different suits share no card, so the four blocks are disjoint. Without that, adding the four counts would overcount, which is the failure this page's counterexample exhibits.

  • What is deliberately absent. Turning 5148/2598960 into a probability needs a probability space, which the library does not have here. The temptation to write one down is exactly the place a worked example smuggles in machinery it has not got.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources