Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Five-card hands from a 52-card deck: (525)=2598960, and the count of hands with all cards of one suit

Example

Model a deck as the set D:=13×4, a rank paired with a suit, so ∣D∣=52 by The product rule: ∣A×B∣=∣A∣ ∣B∣, and ∣∏i<mAi∣=∏i<m∣Ai∣. A hand is a five-element subset of D, that is an element of [D]5. Then

∣[D]5∣=(525)=2598960,

and the number of hands all of whose cards share a suit is

4⋅(135)=4⋅1287=5148.

No probability is claimed anywhere. There is no probability space in this library at this point in the reading order; these are counts of sets, and nothing below divides one by another or calls a count a chance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The deck D=13×4; for s<4 the suit Ds:=13×{s}; and the falling factorials computed from n0‾=1 and nσ(k)‾=nk‾(n−k) (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N).

[L4]

Cancellation by a nonzero natural (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The deck has ∣D∣=∣13∣⋅∣4∣=13⋅4=52 by [L3], and a hand is by definition an element of [D]5, so the number of hands is (525) by [L1].

givenL1L3
2.1

The total. By [L2], (525)⋅5!=525‾=52⋅51⋅50⋅49⋅48. Computing the falling factorial step by step: 52⋅51=2652, 2652⋅50=132600, 132600⋅49=6497400, 6497400⋅48=311875200. Since 5!=120 and 120⋅2598960=311875200, cancellation by 120 gives (525)=2598960.

step 1.1L2L4
2.2

The single-suit hands. Let F be the set of hands all of whose cards lie in one suit, and for s<4 let Fs be the set of hands contained in Ds. The Fs are pairwise disjoint, since a hand has five cards and cannot lie in two different suits at once, and their union is F. Each Ds=13×{s} is in bijection with 13 under the first projection, so ∣Fs∣=∣[Ds]5∣=(135) by [L1]. By [L2], (135)⋅120=135‾=13⋅12⋅11⋅10⋅9=154440, and 120⋅1287=154440, so (135)=1287. Finally [L3] gives ∣F∣=∑s∈4∣Fs∣=4⋅1287=5148.

step 1.1L1L2L3L4
3.1

So there are 2598960 hands in all, of which 5148 have all five cards of one suit. Both numbers are cardinalities of explicitly described sets, and neither is a probability.

step 2.1step 2.2∎

Remarks

  • The sum rule is doing real work in step 2.2, and its hypothesis is checked rather than assumed: two different suits share no card, so the four blocks are disjoint. Without that, adding the four counts would overcount, which is the failure this page's counterexample exhibits.

  • What is deliberately absent. Turning 5148/2598960 into a probability needs a probability space, which the library does not have here. The temptation to write one down is exactly the place a worked example smuggles in machinery it has not got.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources