How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if
Statement
Let be a finite set (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable) and let . Then:
- is finite;
- (The cardinality of a finite set);
- if and only if ;
- every injection is a bijection, and every surjection is a bijection.
Clause 3 is the finite form of the Dedekind statement: a finite set is not equinumerous with a proper subset of itself. Clause 4 is its working form, and finiteness is exactly the hypothesis that fails in general: the successor map is an injection of into itself that is not surjective, which is the false statement recorded on this page's companion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set , its cardinality , and a subset . Throughout, and , the latter because (Addition of natural numbers).
Induction: a property holding at and inherited by successors holds at every natural (The principle of mathematical induction).
On the order is membership: , , and ; also (On the order is membership: , Order on the natural numbers, The natural numbers (von Neumann)). By the definition of the strict order, is impossible.
Cardinality (The cardinality of a finite set): is the unique natural with ; ; ; and if is finite and then is finite with (transport).
Maps and equinumerosity (Injection, surjection, bijection, Equinumerous sets, and , Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable): is finite when for some ; the restriction of an injection to a subset of its domain is an injection; an injection is a bijection onto its image; inverses and composites of bijections are bijections; and for a bijection and contained in its domain.
Order and successor: implies , and implies (Order is compatible with addition, Addition is cancellative, with ).
Discreteness: (Discreteness: is the immediate successor).
Well-ordering: every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Proof
The whole theorem rests on the special case where the ambient set is a natural number, which we call : for every and every , the set is finite, , and implies . It is proved by induction on .
Base case . Since , a subset satisfies ; so is finite with , and indeed gives .
Inductive hypothesis. Fix and assume holds for : every is finite with , and implies .
Let and put , so that , and when while with when . By the inductive hypothesis of step 1.3 the set is finite; write , so , and forces .
Case . Here is finite with , and gives ; moreover is impossible, since would give by [L6], so the third assertion of holds vacuously in this case.
Case . Choose a bijection , which exists because , and define by for and ; the two clauses do not conflict, since . Then is injective, because is injective and takes its values in , so no value equals ; and is surjective onto . Hence , so is finite with .
In the case we therefore have , because ; and if then , so , so and therefore .
The two cases are exhaustive, so holds at whenever it holds at ; with the base case this gives for every .
Clauses 1 and 2 in general. Fix a bijection , available since . Then , and the restriction of to is a bijection of onto , so . By the set is finite with , hence is finite with .
Clause 3. If then . Conversely assume . Then by transport, so by , and therefore , because is a bijection of onto .
Clause 4, the injective half. Let be injective. Then is a bijection of onto its image , so by transport, and clause 3 gives . Thus is surjective, hence a bijection.
Clause 4, the surjective half. Let be surjective. For each the set is nonempty, so it has a least element by [L7]; let be the value of at that least element. No choice principle is used, since each is determined by rather than selected. By construction , that is for every ; and is injective, since gives . So is a bijection by step 8.1.
Composing on the right with gives , which is a bijection; so a surjection of onto itself is a bijection, and in particular an injection.
Clauses 1 and 2 are step 6.1, clause 3 is step 7.1, and clause 4 is steps 8.1 and 10.1, each resting on the induction that establishes .
Remarks
-
Where finiteness is spent. Only in , and there only through the base case and the fact that removing the top point of leaves . Clause 4 then follows formally, which is why the failure of clause 4 for is a failure of finiteness and of nothing else.
-
The surjective half needs no choice. The obvious argument, "pick a preimage of each ", would need a choice function on the fibres. Transporting the fibres into and taking least elements replaces the choice by a determination, which is what The well-ordering principle is for.
-
Clause 2 is not the pigeonhole principle restated. The pigeonhole principle on is about injections between natural numbers, and it is what makes The cardinality of a finite set well posed in the first place; clause 2 compares the cardinalities of a set and a subset, and is proved here by induction directly.
Depends on
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- Equinumerous sets, $A \approx B$ and $A \preceq B$
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- On $\mathbb{N}$ the order is membership: $m < n \iff m \in n$
- Order on the natural numbers
- Addition of natural numbers
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Addition is cancellative
- Order is compatible with addition
- Discreteness: $\sigma(n)$ is the immediate successor
- The well-ordering principle
Used by
- ∑_k<n+1binomnk = 2ⁿ, and ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for n ≥ 1 Corollary
- A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it Corollary
- Both forms of Möbius inversion hold on every finite poset Corollary
- Every finite group has a finite presentation from its multiplication table Corollary
- Every group of order p², for prime p, is abelian Corollary
- For K≤ H≤ G with G finite, [G:K]=[G:H][H:K] Corollary
- φ(1)=1, and φ(p)=p-1 for every prime p Corollary
- A count that overcounts because the blocks are not disjoint, and exactly where the sum rule's hypothesis is spent Counterexample
- A finite family (Aᵢ)_i ∈ I of subsets of a finite set X, the intersections A_J for J ⊆ I, and the convention A_∅ = X Definition
- A relation R ⊆ X × Y between finite sets, its row fibres Rₓ and its column fibres Rʸ Definition
- Cliques, independent sets, clique number and independence number Definition
- Cliques, stable sets, the clique number ω(G) and stability number α(G) Definition
- Compositions and weak compositions of a natural number into a fixed number of parts Definition
- Height and width of a nonempty finite poset Definition
- Intervals in a poset; locally finite, lower-finite and upper-finite posets Definition
- The derangement number Dₙ: the number of bijections of an n-element set with no fixed point Definition
- The induced-embedding count ind_H(G) Definition
- The multinomial coefficient binomnk₀,…,kₘ₋₁ as the number of ordered partitions of an n-set into blocks of prescribed sizes Definition
- The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient binomnk := | [n]ᵏ| Definition
- The unit group (ℤ/n)^× and Euler's totient φ(n)=|(ℤ/n)^×| for n≥1 Definition
- All nine derangements of a four-element set listed, and the count checked against the formula and both recurrences Example
- Distributing a finite set over a finite set of boxes, with the ceiling bound computed and attained Example
- For a finite symmetric irreflexive relation the sum of the neighbour counts is twice the number of unordered related pairs Example
- In a finite set with a symmetric irreflexive relation and at least two elements, two elements have equally many neighbours Example
- The sieve run in full on three explicit finite sets and then on four, with every nonempty intersection listed Example
- The surjections from a five-element set onto a three-element set counted by the sieve formula and by direct subtraction Example
- FALSE: every injection of a set into itself is a bijection False statement
- FALSE: In every commutative ring, each nonzero element is either a unit or a zero divisor False statement
- ∑_i ∈ S∑_j ∈ T aᵢⱼ = ∑_(i,j) ∈ S × T aᵢⱼ = ∑_j ∈ T∑_i ∈ S aᵢⱼ for finite index sets S and T Lemma
- A finite lattice has a bottom and a top, and every element is the join of the join-irreducible elements below it Lemma
- A maximal pairwise disjoint subfamily either supplies a sunflower or gives a small transversal for the whole uniform family Lemma
- Extending a basis of the kernel to a basis of the domain gives a basis of the image Lemma
- If every diagonal value of an incidence function is a unit, recursive interval formulas construct both a left and a right convolution inverse Lemma
- In a finite group, the subgroup, every coset and the set of cosets are finite Lemma
- The divisibility poset is lower-finite, and each divisor interval factorises as a product of finite chains of prime exponents Lemma
- The down-set and up-set chain covers from a suitable maximum antichain splice to a width-sized chain cover Lemma
- The order ideals of a finite poset form a distributive lattice under union and intersection Lemma
- The Samuel uniformity is totally bounded Lemma
- The set of spanning trees of a finite graph is finite Lemma
- A finite set A with | A| = n has exactly n! bijections onto itself, and n! bijections onto any set of the same cardinality Theorem
…and 21 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 44 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Finite set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dedekind-infinite set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Halmos, Naive Set Theory, §13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Sylvestre, Elementary Foundations 12.02, Properties of finite sets and their cardinality (LibreTexts) (standard reference, not scraped)