Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chords of a labelled convex polygon, crossing, and triangulations, defined combinatorially

Definition

Let mN with m2, and write the vertices of a labelled convex m-gon as the cyclically ordered set {1,2,,m}.

A chord is a two-element subset {i,j} with 1i<jm. It is a side when j=i+1 or (i,j)=(1,m), and a diagonal otherwise.

Two chords {i,j} and {k,} cross when

i<k<j<ork<i<<j.

This is a condition on the cyclic order of the labels alone; no segment and no area enters the definition.

A triangulation of the labelled m-gon is a set T of diagonals such that

  1. no two members of T cross; and
  2. T is maximal with that property.

Write Pm for the set of triangulations of the labelled m-gon.

For m=2 and m=3 there are no diagonals at all, so the empty set is the unique triangulation:

P2={},P3={}.

For every fixed m the set of diagonals is finite, being a subset of the finite set of all chords, so Pm is a finite set of finite sets (A subset of a finite set is finite, with BA, and equality holds if and only if B=A, The cardinality A of a finite set).

Remarks

  • The word "convex" in the title is only the picture attached to the cyclic order on the labels. The development below uses only the combinatorial crossing relation written above.

  • The side {1,m} is singled out often enough to deserve a name: it is the closing side. The splitting lemma below decomposes a triangulation along the unique triangle touching that side.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources