How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cliques, stable sets, the clique number and stability number
Definition
Let be a finite simple graph. A set is a clique when every two distinct vertices of are adjacent, equivalently when is complete. It is a stable set, or independent set, when no two distinct vertices of are adjacent, equivalently when is edgeless (Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs, Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
The clique number and stability number are
Both maxima exist because the families are nonempty, containing , and lie inside the finite power set of (The cardinality of a finite set, for finite , A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , The well-ordering principle). In particular, .
Depends on
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs
- Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that $P_n$ and $C_n$ have $n$ vertices
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- $\lvert\mathcal{P}(A)\rvert = 2^{\lvert A\rvert}$ for finite $A$
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- The well-ordering principle
Used by
- A c-sparse set X satisfies α(G[X])≥|X|/(c|X|+1), and a c-dense set satisfies ω(G[X])≥|X|/(c|X|+1) Corollary
- An α-narrow graph has a clique or stable set of size at least |V(G)|^1/(2α) Corollary
- Every bull-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least |V(G)|^1/4 Corollary
- Every P₄-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least the square root of its order Corollary
- Every perfect graph has a clique or stable set of size at least the square root of its order Corollary
- The five-cycle is bull-free but not perfect Counterexample
- A perfect graph Definition
- Generalized nice finite graph families Definition
- Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number hom(G)=max{ω(G),α(G)} Definition
- Perfect graphs Definition
- Property (*) for a finite graph family Definition
- The parameter kappa(G)=alpha(G)omega(G) Definition
- A two-block pure blockade can realize equality in the additive kappa theorem Example
- For 0≤ε<1/2, every sufficiently large ε-restricted set lies in one side Example
- In a disjoint union of cliques of order k the whole vertex set is (k/n)-sparse Example
- The 0-sparse sets are exactly the stable sets and the 0-dense sets exactly the cliques Example
- Every c-sparse set of size m contains a stable set of size at least m/2 False statement
- A complete connection of two perfect graphs is perfect Lemma
- A disjoint union of two perfect graphs is perfect Lemma
- A large Y-part in a structural comb partition yields the clique-or-stable-set outcome Lemma
- Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ω(Ḡ)=α(G) Lemma
- hom(G[W])lehom(G) for every vertex subset W Lemma
- Without a large ε-sparse induced subgraph, the number of k-vertex stable sets is bounded Lemma
- Why this page says module where some sources say homogeneous set Remark
- A pure blockade with a cograph pattern has additive kappa Theorem
- A tau-critical graph has no wide pure blockade with cograph pattern Theorem
- A tau-critical graph with a large low-degree induced subgraph has a rooted stable-tooth comb Theorem
- Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if H₁ and H₂ have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from H₁ by substituting H₂ for a vertex Theorem
- Every perfect graph satisfies |V(G)|<=kappa(G) Theorem
- The C5-free graphs satisfy a polynomial kappa bound Theorem
- The Erdos-Hajnal property is equivalent to the large-cograph, large-perfect, and kappa formulations Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Preview Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)