How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices
Definition
On a finite vertex set , the empty graph has edge set and the complete graph has edge set . When is an -element labelled set, these are also denoted and .
For disjoint finite sets and , the complete bipartite graph has vertex set and edge set
If and , it is denoted .
The path graph has vertices. For , take vertices and edges for ; it has length . Set equal to the null graph. The cycle graph is defined only for : it has vertices , the consecutive edges for , and the closing edge . Thus in this notation the subscript records the number of vertices, not the length of a path.
Depends on
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- Unless stated otherwise, graph means finite, simple and undirected; orders, sizes and empty-set conventions are fixed here
- A bipartite graph and a proper two-colouring of its vertices
- Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges
Used by
- Every nonempty hereditary graph class contains the null graph Corollary
- K₅ and K_3,3 are nonplanar Corollary
- The complete graph on an n-element vertex set has binomn2 edges Corollary
- A graph on n vertices with n-1 edges need not be a tree Counterexample
- A vertex order on P₄ makes greedy colouring use three colours although χ(P₄)=2 Counterexample
- A weighted graph with two distinct minimum spanning trees Counterexample
- An acyclic graph need not be a tree Counterexample
- C₆ and the disjoint union of two triangles have the same degree sequence but are not isomorphic Counterexample
- K_3,3 satisfies |E|≤3|V|-6 but is nonplanar, so the planar edge bound is not sufficient Counterexample
- K₃ contains P₃ as a subgraph but not as an induced subgraph Counterexample
- K₃ has ν(K₃)=1<2=τ(K₃), so König's equality needs bipartiteness Counterexample
- K₄ is Hamiltonian but has no Euler circuit Counterexample
- K₄ is planar but has chromatic number four, so the five-colour bound cannot be lowered to three Counterexample
- P₃ has a Hamilton path but no Hamilton cycle Counterexample
- The class of connected graphs is not hereditary Counterexample
- The class of regular graphs is not hereditary Counterexample
- The middle edge of P₄ is a maximal matching but the two end edges form a larger matching Counterexample
- Two disjoint copies of Kₘ show that Dirac's bound cannot be lowered to n/2-1 for even n=2m≥4 Counterexample
- Two triangles sharing one vertex form a connected simple graph with all degrees even that is not a cycle Counterexample
- Two triangles sharing one vertex form an Eulerian graph with no Hamilton cycle Counterexample
- A tournament is an orientation of a complete finite graph Definition
- Cliques, stable sets, the clique number ω(G) and stability number α(G) Definition
- Maximal plane graphs, plane triangulations, and maximally planar abstract graphs Definition
- Vertex cuts, edge cuts, vertex connectivity κ(G) and edge connectivity λ(G), with conventions for complete and one-vertex graphs Definition
- A connected graph with two distinct spanning trees Example
- A graph is P₃-free if and only if every connected component is complete Example
- Complete graphs form the hereditary class with forbidden basis {overline K₂} Example
- Complete, anticomplete and mixed vertex-set pairs in P₄ Example
- Edgeless graphs form the hereditary class with forbidden basis {K₂} Example
- Euler's formula checked on a plane tree, a cycle, and the four-face embedding of K₄ Example
- In K_2,3, the two vertices in the two-part have three internally disjoint paths and a minimum separator of size three Example
- K_3,3 has a Hamilton cycle Example
- K₄ with one new vertex adjacent to two clique vertices satisfies Ore's condition but not Dirac's condition Example
- K₅ and K_3,3 illustrate complete and complete bipartite graphs, degrees and edge counts Example
- P₄ is both connected and anticonnected Example
- R(3,3)=6 in both directions: the six-vertex argument and the red 5-cycle whose blue complement is another 5-cycle Example
- The complete graph Kₙ has chromatic number n Example
- The isomorphism types of trees on at most five vertices Example
- τ(Cₙ)=n for every n≥3 Example
- Every hereditary graph class has a finite forbidden induced-subgraph basis False statement
…and 7 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, Chapter 1 preview (standard reference, not scraped)