How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices
Definition
On a finite vertex set , the empty graph has edge set and the complete graph has edge set . When is an -element labelled set, these are also denoted and .
For disjoint finite sets and , the complete bipartite graph has vertex set and edge set
If and , it is denoted .
The path graph has vertices. For , take vertices and edges for ; it has length . Set equal to the null graph. The cycle graph is defined only for : it has vertices , the consecutive edges for , and the closing edge . Thus in this notation the subscript records the number of vertices, not the length of a path.
Depends on
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- Unless stated otherwise, graph means finite, simple and undirected; orders, sizes and empty-set conventions are fixed here
- A bipartite graph and a proper two-colouring of its vertices
- Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges
Used by
- Every bipartite graph with at least one edge has Turán density zero Corollary
- Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property Corollary
- Every nonempty hereditary graph class contains the null graph Corollary
- K₅ and K_3,3 are nonplanar Corollary
- Substituting a complete or an edgeless graph for a vertex preserves the Erdős–Hajnal property Corollary
- The complete graph on an n-element vertex set has C(n, 2) edges Corollary
- The five-cycle has the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- The five-vertex path and its complement have the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- The four-vertex path has the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- The star-expansion of the four-vertex path and its complement have the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- A difference of two nested modules that is not a module Counterexample
- A graph on n vertices with n-1 edges need not be a tree Counterexample
- A star has tiny self-density, yet no restricted subset containing its centre has more than two vertices Counterexample
- A vertex order on P₄ makes greedy colouring use three colours although χ(P₄)=2 Counterexample
- A weighted graph with two distinct minimum spanning trees Counterexample
- An acyclic graph need not be a tree Counterexample
- An induced subgraph of a prime graph need not be prime Counterexample
- C₆ and the disjoint union of two triangles have the same degree sequence but are not isomorphic Counterexample
- Induced removal must permit adding edges as well as deleting them Counterexample
- K_3,3 satisfies |E|≤3|V|-6 but is nonplanar, so the planar edge bound is not sufficient Counterexample
- K₃ contains P₃ as a subgraph but not as an induced subgraph Counterexample
- K₃ has ν(K₃)=1<2=τ(K₃), so König's equality needs bipartiteness Counterexample
- K₄ is Hamiltonian but has no Euler circuit Counterexample
- K₄ is planar but has chromatic number four, so the five-colour bound cannot be lowered to three Counterexample
- Maximal proper modules need not be disjoint when the graph or its complement is disconnected Counterexample
- P₃ has a Hamilton path but no Hamilton cycle Counterexample
- The class of connected graphs is not hereditary Counterexample
- The class of regular graphs is not hereditary Counterexample
- The dense alternative in Rödl's theorem cannot be dropped Counterexample
- The five-cycle is bull-free but not perfect Counterexample
- The half graph has no regularity across its natural bipartition at a fixed small parameter Counterexample
- The middle edge of P₄ is a maximal matching but the two end edges form a larger matching Counterexample
- The polynomial Rödl witness need not be the whole graph Counterexample
- Two cospectral graphs need not be isomorphic Counterexample
- Two disjoint copies of Kₘ show that Dirac's bound cannot be lowered to n/2-1 for even n=2m≥4 Counterexample
- Two disjoint modules whose union is not a module Counterexample
- Two triangles sharing one vertex form a connected simple graph with all degrees even that is not a cycle Counterexample
- Two triangles sharing one vertex form an Eulerian graph with no Hamilton cycle Counterexample
- A decomposition of a graph's edge set into complete bipartite subgraphs Definition
- A tournament is an orientation of a complete finite graph Definition
…and 106 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, Chapter 1 preview (standard reference, not scraped)