How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dense alternative in Rödl's theorem cannot be dropped
Statement refuted
The dense alternative in Rödl's theorem is unnecessary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real and the complete graph with .
A set is -sparse when each of its vertices has at most neighbours inside it (-sparse, -dense and -restricted vertex sets).
A graph is -free when it has no induced three-vertex path (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention, Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Counterexample
Every nonempty subset of with has each vertex adjacent to all other vertices of .
If such an were -sparse, then [L1] would force . Hence every -sparse subset of has size at most , a bound independent of .
The graph is -free, since every three vertices induce a triangle rather than a path. For any proposed positive linear constant , choosing makes every -sparse set smaller than by step 2.1. Thus a linear restricted set in this -free family must use the dense alternative, which cannot be discarded.
Depends on
- $c$-sparse, $c$-dense and $c$-restricted vertex sets
- Rödl: for every $H$ and every $\epsilon\in(0,\tfrac12)$ there is $\delta>0$ such that every nonempty $H$-free graph has an $\epsilon$-restricted vertex set of size at least $\delta|V(G)|$
- $H$-free and $\mathcal F$-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
- Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that $P_n$ and $C_n$ have $n$ vertices
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.