How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
Definition
For finite graphs and , the graph is -free when has no induced copy of (Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph). Equivalently,
(The induced-embedding count ).
For a family of finite graphs, a finite graph is -free when it is -free for every . Throughout this page, “free” always refers to induced subgraphs. It does not merely prohibit ordinary subgraph copies.
Depends on
Used by
- An H-free graph has a linearly large induced subgraph whose graph or complement has bounded maximum degree Corollary
- Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property Corollary
- Every P₄-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least the square root of its order Corollary
- For a single graph, the Erdős–Hajnal property, the polynomial Rödl property, and virality are equivalent Corollary
- For every λ>0 a bounded number of disjoint ε-restricted sets covers all but λ|V(G)| vertices of an H-free graph Corollary
- G is H-free if and only if Ḡ is H̄-free Corollary
- Rödl: for every H and every ε∈(0,1/2) there is δ>0 such that every nonempty H-free graph has an ε-restricted vertex set of size at least δ|V(G)| Corollary
- Rödl's theorem for a nonempty family of forbidden induced subgraphs Corollary
- The polynomial Rödl property implies the Erdős–Hajnal property Corollary
- The seven-cycle and its complement have the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- The singleton family {E} has property (*) Corollary
- The six-cycle and its complement have the Erdős-Hajnal property Corollary
- The viral property implies the polynomial Rödl property Corollary
- The dense alternative in Rödl's theorem cannot be dropped Counterexample
- The empty forbidden family is not Erdős–Hajnal Counterexample
- The polynomial Rödl witness need not be the whole graph Counterexample
- A bull-free graph Definition
- A nice graph Definition
- Generalized nice finite graph families Definition
- Leaf-reducible finite graph families Definition
- Minimal forbidden induced subgraphs and forbidden bases Definition
- Property (*) for a finite graph family Definition
- The polynomial Rödl property for a finite forbidden family Definition
- The structural comb-partition hypothesis Definition
- The viral property for a finite forbidden family Definition
- Wonderful finite graph families Definition
- A graph is P₃-free if and only if every connected component is complete Example
- For P₃-free graphs Rödl's theorem holds with δ=ε, by an explicit argument Example
- A large cy-restricted subgraph in the three-outcome theorem forces a smaller-scale restricted subgraph Lemma
- An induced copy of H₂ inside the extension set of an induced embedding of H₁-v yields an induced copy of H₁ with H₂ substituted for v Lemma
- Every class defined by forbidden induced subgraphs is hereditary Lemma
- Every induced subgraph of an F-free graph is F-free Lemma
- If ε is an Erdős–Hajnal constant for H and W is a nonempty vertex set with |W|^ε>hom(G), then G[W] has an induced copy of H Lemma
- Leaf-reducible families yield a large anticomplete pair or a deeper restricted induced subgraph Lemma
- Small total induced-copy expectation forces many homogeneous k-sets Lemma
- The edge-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction Lemma
- The family consisting of H₅ and co-E has the Erdős–Hajnal property Lemma
- The path-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction Lemma
- A minimal counterexample to a kappa-bound is tau-critical Proposition
- If H is an induced subgraph of H' and H' has the Erdős–Hajnal property, then H has it with every constant of H' Proposition
…and 21 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)