How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small total induced-copy expectation forces many homogeneous -sets
Statement
Let be integers, and let be a finite family of graphs, each with at least one vertex, such that every -free graph has the -homogeneous property. Let be a finite graph on vertices. Choose uniformly from and define
If , then has at least
homogeneous vertex sets of size .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive integers , a finite family of graphs, each with at least one vertex, a finite graph on vertices, the uniform choice of , and the hypothesis .
A graph is -free exactly when it is -free for every (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
is a nonnegative real random variable on the uniform probability space on , and its expectation is the average value over that finite outcome set (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set, Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space, The induced-embedding count ).
If a nonnegative random variable has expectation at most , then the probability that it is at least is at most (Markov's inequality on a finite probability space).
If at least half of the -element subsets of contain a -element induced subgraph in a class with the -homogeneous property, then has at least homogeneous -sets (Many good -vertex subsets force many homogeneous -sets).
Proof
Since is nonnegative and , [L3] gives , so with probability at least one has .
Fix a set with . For each induced embedding counted by choose one vertex from its image; this is possible because every graph in has at least one vertex. Delete from every chosen vertex. Since fewer than embeddings were counted, fewer than vertices are deleted, so at least vertices remain.
Let be any -element subset of the remaining vertices. If some had an induced embedding into , then that same embedding would already have been counted in , so step 2.1 would have deleted a vertex from its image. Because the image lies in , this contradicts the choice of . Thus is -free by [L1].
Steps 2.1 and 3.1 show that with probability at least , a uniformly random -element subset of contains a -element induced subgraph that is -free. Applying [L4] to the class of -free graphs proves the claimed lower bound on homogeneous -sets.
Depends on
- The $(t,k)$-homogeneous property
- $H$-free and $\mathcal F$-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
- The induced-embedding count $\operatorname{ind}_H(G)$
- The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
- Many good $2t$-vertex subsets force many homogeneous $k$-sets
- Markov's inequality on a finite probability space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Bucić, J. Fox, and H. T. Pham, Equivalence between Erdős-Hajnal and polynomial Rödl and Nikiforov conjectures, Lemma 14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. H. Nguyen, Notes on Recent Work on the Erdős–Hajnal Conjecture, Lemma 14 (standard reference, not scraped)