Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The path-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction

Statement

Let G be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let x,y,u be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with xyE(G), uxE(G) and uyE(G), and with x,y complete to that subgraph. If H={a,b,c,d} induces the path abc and isolated vertex d, then u cannot be adjacent to d and two consecutive vertices of the path and nonadjacent to the remaining endpoint.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices {x1,x2,x3,y,z,w} with edge set {x1x2,x2x3,x1x3,x1y,x2z,yw}. So {x1,x2,x3,y,z} spans the bull, and w is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex y. The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.

[F2]

Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs supplies the following definition: Let G be a finite simple graph and let A,BV(G) be disjoint. An edge between A and B is an edge ab with aA and bB. The pair (A,B) is: - complete when every aA is adjacent to every bB; - anticomplete when no aA is adjacent to any bB; - pure when it is complete or anticomplete; and - mixed when it is neither complete nor anticomplete. Adjacency is the symmetric edge relation of G (def-finite-simple-graph, def-graph-adjacency-incidence-neighbourhood-and-degree). If A= or B=, the pair is both complete and anticomplete, hence pure and not mixed.

[F3]

H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention supplies the following definition: For finite graphs H and G, the graph G is H-free when G has no induced copy of H (def-induced-embedding-and-induced-copy). Equivalently, indH(G)=0 (def-induced-copy-number). For a family F of finite graphs, a finite graph G is F-free when it is H-free for every HF. Throughout this page, “free” always refers to induced subgraphs. It does not merely prohibit ordinary subgraph copies.

Proof

Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

Reverse the path if necessary to write the prohibited neighbourhood as N(u)H={b,c,d}. Completeness of y and the prescribed path give exactly the edges ya,yb,yc,yd,ub,uc,ud,ab,bc on (y,u,a,b,c,d).

givenF2
1.2

The six remaining pairs are yu,ua,ac,ad,bd,cd. Under (y,u,a,b,c,d)(w,y,x1,z,x3,x2) they map to wy,yx1,x1x3,x1x2,zx2,x3x2.

given
2.1

These are exactly the six Bird edges; the other nine pairs are therefore exactly co-Bird edges. The induced copy is forbidden.

F1F3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources