Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The path-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction

Statement

Let G be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let x,y,u be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with xy∉E(G), ux∈E(G) and uy∉E(G), and with x,y complete to that subgraph. If H={a,b,c,d} induces the path a−b−c and isolated vertex d, then u cannot be adjacent to d and two consecutive vertices of the path and nonadjacent to the remaining endpoint.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices {x1,x2,x3,y,z,w} with edge set {x1x2,x2x3,x1x3,x1y,x2z,yw}. So {x1,x2,x3,y,z} spans the bull, and w is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex y. The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.

[F2]

Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs supplies the following definition: Let G be a finite simple graph and let A,B⊆V(G) be disjoint. An edge between A and B is an edge ab with a∈A and b∈B. The pair (A,B) is: - complete when every a∈A is adjacent to every b∈B; - anticomplete when no a∈A is adjacent to any b∈B; - pure when it is complete or anticomplete; and - mixed when it is neither complete nor anticomplete. Adjacency is the symmetric edge relation of G (def-finite-simple-graph, def-graph-adjacency-incidence-neighbourhood-and-degree). If A=∅ or B=∅, the pair is both complete and anticomplete, hence pure and not mixed.

[F3]

H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention supplies the following definition: For finite graphs H and G, the graph G is H-free when G has no induced copy of H (def-induced-embedding-and-induced-copy). Equivalently, ind⁡H(G)=0 (def-induced-copy-number). For a family F of finite graphs, a finite graph G is F-free when it is H-free for every H∈F. Throughout this page, “free” always refers to induced subgraphs. It does not merely prohibit ordinary subgraph copies.

Proof

Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1givenF2

Reverse the path if necessary to write the prohibited neighbourhood as N(u)∩H={b,c,d}. Completeness of y and the prescribed path give exactly the edges ya,yb,yc,yd,ub,uc,ud,ab,bc on (y,u,a,b,c,d).

1.2given

The six remaining pairs are yu,ua,ac,ad,bd,cd. Under (y,u,a,b,c,d)↦(w,y,x1,z,x3,x2) they map to wy,yx1,x1x3,x1x2,zx2,x3x2.

2.1F1F3∎

These are exactly the six Bird edges; the other nine pairs are therefore exactly co-Bird edges. The induced copy is forbidden.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources