How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs
Definition
Let be a finite simple graph and let be disjoint. An edge between and is an edge with and .
The pair is:
- complete when every is adjacent to every ;
- anticomplete when no is adjacent to any ;
- pure when it is complete or anticomplete; and
- mixed when it is neither complete nor anticomplete.
Adjacency is the symmetric edge relation of (A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets, Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree). If or , the pair is both complete and anticomplete, hence pure and not mixed.
Depends on
Used by
- Large almost-pure pair hypotheses yield a complete or anticomplete blockade Corollary
- The prime quotient produced by the modular decomposition of a connected and anticonnected graph has at least four vertices Corollary
- Mixedness of block pairs is not transitive Counterexample
- Omitting cross-block purity breaks the transversal conclusion Counterexample
- X can be c-sparse to Y while Y is not c-sparse to X Counterexample
- A rooted stable-tooth comb Definition
- Combs in a graph Definition
- Complete, anticomplete, pure, weakly sparse, and x-sparse blockades Definition
- Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets Definition
- Modular partitions and the quotient graph they define Definition
- Modules of a graph, and the trivial modules Definition
- Sparsity of one vertex set to another, and weak sparsity of a pair Definition
- The mixed-block reachability relation on a blockade Definition
- The strong Erdős–Hajnal property for a hereditary graph class Definition
- Wonderful finite graph families Definition
- A large almost-pure pair extends an anticomplete blockade Example
- Complete and anticomplete disjoint pairs are 0-regular Example
- Complete, anticomplete and mixed vertex-set pairs in P₄ Example
- A complete-or-weakly-sparse blockade can be thinned to equal subblocks with directional sparsity Lemma
- A module of G[M] is a module of G whenever M is a module of G Lemma
- A polynomial homogeneous set in the auxiliary pattern yields a y⁴-restricted union Lemma
- A quotient block of connected or anticonnected blocks is again connected or anticonnected Lemma
- A separated anticonnected block pair forbids mixing in one direction Lemma
- A vertex mixed on a connected set has opposite adjacency on some edge of that set Lemma
- A vertex mixed on a quotient block but pure on each member block yields two mixed member blocks with opposite adjacency Lemma
- A vertex mixed on an anticonnected set yields opposite adjacency on a nonedge Lemma
- A vertex set is a module of G exactly when it is a module of Ḡ Lemma
- A wonderful anticonnected complete-or-sparse blockade yields a restricted subgraph or a large anticomplete pair Lemma
- Blocks from distinct mixed-block classes are pure to each other Lemma
- Distinct connected components are anticomplete, and distinct anticonnected components are complete Lemma
- Every union of connected components is a module, and so is every union of anticonnected components Lemma
- For a modular partition, a set of parts is a module of the quotient exactly when the union of those parts is a module of the graph Lemma
- For disjoint nonempty vertex sets, weak c-sparsity says exactly that the edge density is at most c Lemma
- If M is a module of G and W⊆ V(G), then M∩ W is a module of G[W] Lemma
- If two modules overlap, then each difference and their symmetric difference are modules Lemma
- In a connected and anticonnected graph, the union of two proper modules that meet is again a proper module Lemma
- In a connected graph, some vertex outside a nonempty proper module is complete to it Lemma
- In a special-vertex comb of a co-E-free graph, vertices in other comb blocks remain pure to every H₅-overlap quotient block Lemma
- In G₁ with G₂ substituted for a, the vertex set of G₂ is a module, the two factors are recovered as induced subgraphs, and substituting a one-vertex graph changes nothing Lemma
- Mixed anticonnected blocks lift pattern obstructions to the ambient graph Lemma
…and 20 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)