How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete and anticomplete disjoint pairs are -regular
Statement
If are disjoint nonempty vertex sets that form a complete pair or an anticomplete pair, then is -regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complete or anticomplete disjoint pair .
A pair is -regular when every pair of nonempty subsets , has (-regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets).
In a complete pair all possible cross-edges are present, while in an anticomplete pair none are present (Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs).
Verification
In the complete case, [L2] gives , and every nonempty subpair also has density .
In the anticomplete case, [L2] gives , and every nonempty subpair has density .
Thus the density difference is zero in either case, which is exactly the -regular convention in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics, Definition 2.1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)