How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Combs in a graph
Definition
Let with , and let . An -comb in a graph is a sequence of pairs
satisfying the conditions below.
Here a vertex is complete to (respectively, anticomplete to) a set when the pair is complete (respectively, anticomplete) in the sense of Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs.
- is an -blockade;
- the vertices are distinct;
- the set is disjoint from every block ; and
- for every , the vertex is complete to ; and
- for all distinct , the vertex is anticomplete to .
The vertices are the teeth of the comb.
Depends on
Used by
- A comb can have an edge between two blocks Counterexample
- If a tooth sees a foreign block, the structure is not a comb Counterexample
- Omitting cross-block purity breaks the transversal conclusion Counterexample
- A rooted stable-tooth comb Definition
- E overlap chains inside one comb block Definition
- Property (*) for a finite graph family Definition
- The H₅-overlap-chain relation in one comb block Definition
- The structural comb-partition hypothesis Definition
- A bipartite four-tooth comb has the co-E structural partition Example
- A four-tooth comb with a special vertex realizes the trigger configuration for property (*) Example
- A four-tooth comb with an external complete vertex Example
- A three-tooth comb Example
- The no-E-copy boundary case of the comb partition Example
- A bipartite layer is small unless a large comb already appears Lemma
- A sparse graph either sparsifies further or yields a comb or a large sparse pair Lemma
- Anticonnected block contraction turns an upside-down comb into a pure blockade Lemma
- Complete nonedge pairs force purity on induced E graphs Lemma
- External purity survives every E overlap quotient Lemma
- In a special-vertex comb of a co-E-free graph, vertices in other comb blocks remain pure to every H₅-overlap quotient block Lemma
- A bipartite graph with bounded A-degree has a large comb or a small B-side Theorem
- A special-vertex co-Bird-free comb admits an E-free structural partition Theorem
- A special-vertex comb in a co-E-free graph admits the {H₅,co-E} structural partition Theorem
- The special-vertex-local structural-partition criterion implies property (*) Theorem
- The structural comb-partition criterion implies property (*) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path (standard reference, not scraped)