How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A four-tooth comb with an external complete vertex
Example
Let be five vertices and let for . If the only edges among these nine vertices are for and for , then is a four-tooth comb and the outside vertex is complete to the tooth blocks and anticomplete to the teeth.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The nine labelled vertices above with exactly the displayed edges.
A comb is given by distinct teeth , disjoint blocks , each tooth complete to its own block and anticomplete to the other blocks (Combs in a graph).
Verification
For each , the tooth is adjacent to the unique vertex of its own block and to no vertex of the other three blocks. Therefore satisfies [L1].
By construction the vertex is adjacent to every and to none of the teeth . So has exactly the extra adjacency pattern singled out in the comb outcome of the lemma.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Lemma 2.10 (standard reference, not scraped)