Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A numeric run of the multiplicative iteration in Lemma 2.9

Example

Take c=24,x=28,b1=2,b2=3,b3=3. Then b1b2=6=b2+b3, so the iteration lemma predicts an x-sparse induced subgraph of size at least x6V(G)=248V(G).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The numerical parameters displayed above.

[L1]

Under the lemma's hypotheses, the output size is at least xb1b2V(G) (Iterated sparse restriction reaches the target sparsity threshold).

Verification

technique · arithmetic unpacking
1.1

The equality b1b2=23=6 and b2+b3=3+3=6 shows that the required inequality b1b2b2+b3 is tight in this example.

givenalgebra
2.1

Applying [L1] gives a final induced subgraph of size at least xb1b2V(G)=(28)6V(G)=248V(G). This makes the multiplicative exponent bookkeeping explicit in one concrete case.

step 1.1L1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources